From: Li Yuan
>>
>> > I haven't particularly checked.
>> > But if the two are incompatible, they should really take measures to
>> > prevent running them in parallel, like taking a well-known busname...
>>
>> Well, Mike Gorse or Li Yuan would know the details better. Not sure if
>> it is really i
From: Li Yuan
> Implementing a11y interface in the widget itself may require a big change in
> atk
> as API pointed out. So maybe we can move the gail code into gtk first and do
> the
> further integration later.
Yes, of course, take into account that I added that bug as part of the
"Towards ATK
GLib 2.28.1 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/glib/2.28/
http://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/2.28/
1b85b998909202c07c2def66613ae6736aac48d7a0a7c98f98967b936fe9de22
glib-2.28.1.tar.bz2
66fd85799f2b660cc99460e8d552df85fca4234a279cbf3c2c10931908a01acb
glib-2.28.1.tar.gz
Hi there,
I think I’ve just hit a GObject limitation, but I want to make sure I’m
seeing the whole picture before I start hacking a solution.
The situation is, I have a GObject implementing an interpreter for the
Brainfuck programming language; whenever the interpreter needs to interact
with the
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> From what I’ve seen, to make my code work seamlessy in Gjs the following
> things would need to be done:
>
> * Add support for boxing a GError** into GValue
> * Add support for a ERROR parameter type to glib-genmarshal
>
