Hello,
The GTK+ Reference Manual states that a combo box created with
gtk_combo_box_new_text() should only be manipulated with the functions
gtk_combo_box_append_text(), gtk_combo_box_insert_text(),
gtk_combo_box_prepend_text() and gtk_combo_box_remove_text().
I am interested in removing all
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Timo Schneider wrote:
The GTK+ Reference Manual states that a combo box created with
gtk_combo_box_new_text() should only be manipulated with the functions
gtk_combo_box_append_text(), gtk_combo_box_insert_text(),
gtk_combo_box_prepend_text() and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/2011 08:46 AM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
It seems that you are in fact OK using the GtkComboBox API for
this purpose, as in
void depopulate_combo_box (GtkComboBox *box)
{
GtkTreeModel *model = gtk_combo_box_get_model(box);
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 08:51 -0700, Kevin DeKorte wrote:
On 02/22/2011 08:46 AM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
It seems that you are in fact OK using the GtkComboBox API for
this purpose, as in
void depopulate_combo_box (GtkComboBox *box)
{
GtkTreeModel *model =
2011/2/23 Timo Schneider ti...@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 08:51 -0700, Kevin DeKorte wrote:
On 02/22/2011 08:46 AM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
It seems that you are in fact OK using the GtkComboBox API for
this purpose, as in
void depopulate_combo_box (GtkComboBox *box)
{
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 03:46 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Hi,
If your going to use the model, then perhaps this will work...
gtk_list_store_clear(GTK_LIST_STORE(gtk_combo_box_get_model(GTK_COMBO_BOX(combo_box;
Yes, I can do that. But I think it's a bug in the API if I have to
On Sunday 13 February 2011 22:17:12 Jacques Pelletier wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using GSocket in a GTK application in non-blocking mode.
Once the connection is done, I'm creating a source for the main event loop:
my_source = g_socket_create_source(my_socket, my_events, NULL);
How do we
Any comments about how to improve, missing code, etc.?
I would personally recommend taking a look at the GIOStream API for
processing data sent through the connection, it would help save a bit
of the low-level worries and allow you to get automatically-buffered
input through the help of
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 21:57 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
I'm trying to wrap GtkApplication for gtkmm but I can't really do that
until I understand how it's meant to be used.
In general, I find the documentation lacks overview and advice, partly
because it's spread between GApplication and
OK. I made a patch for GtkArrowAccessible. Do we want to open a bug
to keep all the patches and review them one by one or just commit them
first?
I saw you remove g_return* calls, and also macros like GAIL_IS_IMAGE.
I am not sure why. Are we going to remove all of them from the new code?
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Li Yuan liy...@gnome.org wrote:
OK. I made a patch for GtkArrowAccessible. Do we want to open a bug
to keep all the patches and review them one by one or just commit them
first?
I saw you remove g_return* calls, and also macros like GAIL_IS_IMAGE.
I am not
11 matches
Mail list logo