On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 18:41 +, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:47:59 +0100
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > If it's most programs then surely you can give some example. I don't
> > think that most applications have to deal with caching, bookmarks, and
> > history like Firefox.
>
> I did
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:47:59 +0100
Murray Cumming wrote:
> If it's most programs then surely you can give some example. I don't
> think that most applications have to deal with caching, bookmarks, and
> history like Firefox.
I didn't realise you wanted examples, but most programs that have a
shar
Yes thanks a lot for your reaction. I've already found the tarball.
Stef Bon
Voorburg
the Netherlands
2011/3/8 Tristan Van Berkom :
> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 17:43 +0100, Stef Bon wrote:
>> I'm trying to build the latest version of gobject-introspection. I've
>> got it with git.
>>
>> It's compla
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:54 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > If it's most programs then surely you can give some example. I don't
> > think that most applications have to deal with caching, bookmarks, and
> > history like Firefox.
>
> i thi
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
> If it's most programs then surely you can give some example. I don't
> think that most applications have to deal with caching, bookmarks, and
> history like Firefox.
i think that the kind of thing chris is referring to is something like
"
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 14:54 +, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:48:12 +0100
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:59 +, Chris Vine wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > The case for having single-instance programs in most cases for
> > > programs with a GUI interface seems self-
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:48:12 +0100
Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:59 +, Chris Vine wrote:
> [snip]
> > The case for having single-instance programs in most cases for
> > programs with a GUI interface seems self-evident to me, since most
> > GUI programs keep some running glob
> Sorry, I don't understand. Could you explain in more detail?
If you need to run two different windows in two different locales, then
single-instance is not possible. For Gnumeric this happens regularly
due to the world's decimal separator mess.
The reason you cannot do this in a single instanc
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:01 -0500, Morten Welinder wrote:
> > What global state, for instance?
>
> locale?
>
> As a reminder, setlocale is not thread-safe.
Sorry, I don't understand. Could you explain in more detail? Why would
two separate instances (separate processes) of the same app care if
s
> What global state, for instance?
locale?
As a reminder, setlocale is not thread-safe.
M.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:59 +, Chris Vine wrote:
[snip]
> The case for having single-instance programs in most cases for
> programs with a GUI interface seems self-evident to me, since most
> GUI programs keep some running global state which would be extremely
> tedious to synchronise between d
Any chance of getting reviews of patches for Win32 bugs?
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614920
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619564
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617874
Morten
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-dev
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:12:39 +0100
Alexandre Mazari wrote:
> > However, the deficiency I have found in the past with respect to
> > implementing single instance programs using gtk+/gnome is the window
> > manager. Usually in the circumstances I have described you want
> > gtk_window_present() to
> However, the deficiency I have found in the past with respect to
> implementing single instance programs using gtk+/gnome is the window
> manager. Usually in the circumstances I have described you want
> gtk_window_present() to do what it says it does (for the remote dbus
> callback to bring up
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:16:44 +
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 at 22:16, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Cowie
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 12:06 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > >> I would very much like some reasoning to point people at when I
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
