Re: gtk+ win32 binaries

2011-03-28 Thread Kean Johnston
The former windows maintainer doesnt have time anymore [2] to do the windows binaries, so any help is very welcomed Pedro, You and I should talk. I too have compiled up everything for Win32 (busy testing Win64 at the moment). My particular solution is a bit broader as it compiles everything ne

Re: gtk+ win32 binaries

2011-03-28 Thread Javier Jardón
On 25 March 2011 23:37, Pedro Santos wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Since the past six months I've actively used gtk+ and I noticed some lag > between the source release and win32 binary builds. Because of this, I've to > build gtk+ myself in order to use the most recent distribution. So, I'm > wond

Re: GTK+ 3, Win32 and GtkApplication (DBus woes)

2011-03-28 Thread Kean Johnston
Yes I'm sorry about that. I innocently assumed it would be properly portable as everything in GTK+ is portable, and there was no proper notation that the application object was not available on win32 or osx (like say, GtkUnixPrint widgets). For the most part it seems that GTK+'s portability holds

Re: GTK+ 3, Win32 and GtkApplication (DBus woes)

2011-03-28 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Kean Johnston wrote: > On 3/28/2011 1:12 PM, Paul Davis wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Kean Johnston >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hello everyone, >> >> GtkApplication is a rather new piece of the GTK API. There has been >> quite a bit of discussion about its r

gtk+ win32 binaries

2011-03-28 Thread Pedro Santos
Hello everyone, Since the past six months I've actively used gtk+ and I noticed some lag between the source release and win32 binary builds. Because of this, I've to build gtk+ myself in order to use the most recent distribution. So, I'm wondering if I can give you some help building win32 bin

Re: gio async usage from gtk+ ...

2011-03-28 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 21:52 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 14:47 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > I'll build a package to test your patch in a second too. > > Well - the patch solves the problem for me; inasmuch as I can no longer > make it crash (or assert

Re: GTK+ 3, Win32 and GtkApplication (DBus woes)

2011-03-28 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Kean Johnston wrote: >Considering what a long history Gtk+ has of being > very portable, I would say that this is a subtle mis-perception. GTK's support for non *nix, non-X11 platforms has happened generally inspite of, rather than because of any central portabili

Re: GTK+ 3, Win32 and GtkApplication (DBus woes)

2011-03-28 Thread Kean Johnston
On 3/28/2011 1:12 PM, Paul Davis wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Kean Johnston wrote: Hello everyone, GtkApplication is a rather new piece of the GTK API. There has been quite a bit of discussion about its role and its impact on cross platform portability. I'll try read more of the ma

Re: GTK+ 3, Win32 and GtkApplication (DBus woes)

2011-03-28 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Kean Johnston wrote: > Hello everyone, GtkApplication is a rather new piece of the GTK API. There has been quite a bit of discussion about its role and its impact on cross platform portability. The answer for now is that if you want cross platform portability, si

GTK+ 3, Win32 and GtkApplication (DBus woes)

2011-03-28 Thread Kean Johnston
Hello everyone, I am new to this list and I am attempting to write my first GTK+ application. For a change of pace, I decided to do my primary development on Windows instead of Linux, as the particular application I am writing will most likely be run most often on Windows. I chose GTK+ as the