On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
>
> Of course, having an invalid DTD in the docs (and another one for
> GtkUIManager, incidentally) isn't good. If nobody cares about the
> DTD per se, maybe we should look at less 1980s ways of conveying
> the grammar.
>
Sure, I wouldn't obj
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 17:01 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > Ryan asked me to look at the DTDs for the menu markup and GtkBuilder
> > interface definitions, since he merged everything over to GtkBuilder.
> > Here's the old menumarkup.dtd:
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> Ryan asked me to look at the DTDs for the menu markup and GtkBuilder
> interface definitions, since he merged everything over to GtkBuilder.
> Here's the old menumarkup.dtd:
>
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/tree/gio/menumarkup.dtd?id=4e9f
Ryan asked me to look at the DTDs for the menu markup and GtkBuilder
interface definitions, since he merged everything over to GtkBuilder.
Here's the old menumarkup.dtd:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/tree/gio/menumarkup.dtd?id=4e9f59bff8adc59fd8fde5bdee9879b8c3e4e55b
And here's what our docs s