On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 11:20 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
Attached a new version as a late update to this thread, but better
than nothing I hope :-) I still haven't gotten around to sticking it
in libegg (or even a bug). Sorry! I'll do that when I am more happy
with what I have.
On 05/29/2012 05:36 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 11:20 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
Attached a new version as a late update to this thread, but better
than nothing I hope :-) I still haven't gotten around to sticking it
in libegg (or even a bug). Sorry! I'll do
On 05/29/2012 07:23 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsenmikkel.kamst...@canonical.com writes:
I have been looking at gcc's cleanup attribute[1] that allows one to
specify a callback that will be invoked when a variable goes out of
scope. This allows one to play with automatically
