Re: next steps for touch support in GTK+

2012-08-02 Thread Paul Davis
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > > === 3. SpinButton === > [ ... ] > > Another option is introducing a complete new widget targeted at touch > usage (similar to the one in iOS Garageband) [4] which Carlos implemented > already [5]. The issue is here the height, which at

Re: next steps for touch support in GTK+

2012-08-02 Thread Morten Welinder
> === 4. Which GTK+ widgets break with touch === > The SpinButton item from above is one example of those. I really hope the solution is neither "remove anything that doesn't work with touch" or "parallel widget hierarchy". GtkSwitch bugs me. It really should just have been a styling of the togg

Re: GTK+ meetup at Guadec

2012-08-02 Thread Andrew Cowie
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:21 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > Convince chpe that it is ok to have his comments indexed and I'll gladly > have Bugzilla indexed. Sorry, don't know what the context of that is (though if it's about privacy it sounds rather soft given that, robots.txt or not, the comments

next steps for touch support in GTK+

2012-08-02 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, there have been several discussions around GTK+ touch support during GUADEC. To get a good touch experience we talked about the following points. I ordered them by priority that we set in Sugar development for them. If you come across something that we missed, please comment. === 1. Text