On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Morten Welinder wrote:
>
>>
>> Note, that there are other large parts of glib, such as gio, that
>> have basically don't work on win32. And have five-year old
>> patches in bugzilla.
>>
>
> Getting win32 pat
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Morten Welinder wrote:
>
> Note, that there are other large parts of glib, such as gio, that
> have basically don't work on win32. And have five-year old
> patches in bugzilla.
>
Getting win32 patches merged requires somebody with an interest in
GLib/GTK+ on that
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 05:33 -0800, Simon Feltman wrote:
> For completeness, the two major problems are as follows:
>
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687522
> This is a vfunc implementation which the gtk internals are basically
> expecting a floating ref from. Using the standard sch
> It can be "easily fixed" in the sense that every application also would then
> need to be fixed...
Behdad, you're sitting in your ivory tower and throwing mud at
suggested patches from people who suffer from this bug. What
is the point of that? In the meantime, as Krzysztof points out,
GOption
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 02:13 PM, Krzysztof Kosiński wrote:
>> This bug, which makes GOption useless on Windows and has accumulated
>> 93 comments so far, could be easily fixed (it has patches) if someone
>> finally decided which way is preferable.
>
On 02/05/2013 02:13 PM, Krzysztof Kosiński wrote:
> 2013/2/4 Matthias Clasen :
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> a while ago, we've talked about getting a handle on the enormous
>> number of open bugs in glib and gtk.
>
> This bug, which makes GOption useless on Windows and has accumulated
> 93 comments so f
2013/2/4 Matthias Clasen :
> Hi everybody,
>
> a while ago, we've talked about getting a handle on the enormous
> number of open bugs in glib and gtk.
This bug, which makes GOption useless on Windows and has accumulated
93 comments so far, could be easily fixed (it has patches) if someone
finally
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 07:49 -0500, D.H. Bahr wrote:
> is it possible to set an image as a background for a widget, say a
> GtkEventBox?
Broken since 3.3.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672858
Regards,
Peter Hurley
___
gtk-devel-list m
Thanks, I've been working around that using CSS..
El mar, 05-02-2013 a las 09:09 -0500, Peter Hurley escribió:
> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 07:49 -0500, D.H. Bahr wrote:
> > is it possible to set an image as a background for a widget, say a
> > GtkEventBox?
>
> Broken since 3.3.
>
> See https://bugzi
For completeness, the two major problems are as follows:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687522
This is a vfunc implementation which the gtk internals are basically
expecting a floating ref from. Using the standard scheme just listed, we
sink and own the created MenuToolButton. The held
This is basically how PyGObject works now. There are no problems with this
during casual usage when Python is always in the position of the "caller".
The problem is this scheme does not work with the marshaling of floating
widgets passed into Python vfuncs/closures as arguments or intended as
retur
is it possible to set an image as a background for a widget, say a
GtkEventBox?
Best regards,
D.H. Bahr
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On 29/01/13 11:44, Simon Feltman wrote:
> It seems like the problem at hand can be solved by maintaining the
> floating ref and adding our own safety ref for the wrapper.
My impression was that floating references were purely for C
convenience, and that interpreted languages with their own refcoun
The side affect of GtkWindow is actually fine in this case because the
annotation of "transfer none" for gtk_window_new makes sense here. The
function is specifying it returns an internal borrowed reference and Python
will add an additional ref during the wrappers lifetime. However, there is
troubl
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:07:57AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Just thought I should mention this, so nobody gets upset if their
> favourite 10 year old bug is WONTFIXed...
>
With the recent xinput2 work, it would be nice to see this bug get fixed:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6
15 matches
Mail list logo
