On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 18:27 -0800, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I'm having a problem building gtk from Alex's branch. Am I doing
> > something wrong? I had jhbuild t
I thought something like this was already
> done. GtkGLext
>
> http://www.k-3d.org/gtkglext/Main_Page
>
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: gtk-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org
> [mailto:gtk-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org] On Behalf Of C.J.
> Adams-Collier
>
Hey folks,
I'm having a problem building gtk from Alex's branch. Am I doing
something wrong? I had jhbuild take care of building the deps and got
a jhbuild shell before starting the build. I ran configure this way:
./configure --prefix=/opt/gnome --disable-gtk-doc
make gives me this (truncated
Hey all,
I'm planning some time to work on 119189 this weekend. I'm going to
see if I can put together a patch to add gtkgl.c and friends into gtk.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119189
Behdad has suggested (and correct me if I've got this wrong, Behdad)
that he feels that instead of
Hey all,
We were browsing the stock icons from viewvc today and noticed that
the mime type is wrong. Behdad said you all are the folks I should
ask before committing this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/svn/gnome/gtk+/trunk$ svn propset svn:mime-type
image/svg+xml `find ./gtk/stock-icons -name '*.s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Good thoughts. As more folks make known their need for win95 or win98
support, more care will likely be taken to make such win9x backports
(and future backports) easier.
Feel free to vote for or against deprecating gtk+ support fo
On Fri, 2006-25-08 at 22:33 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I think now is the time to decide a couple of issues:
>
> - Can the support for Win9x be dropped from GLib and GTK+ HEAD? Note
> that cairo has never worked on Win9x, so GTK+ has de facto not worked
> on Win9x since 2.8 anyway.
>
> Droppin
On Thu, 2006-17-08 at 18:24 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
> GTK doesn't depend on glitz. It does depend on Cairo, which may be
> linked to glitz, but never creates a glitz surface. If you build
> cairo without glitz, GTK will build and run identically.
>
> So a discussion of an OpenGL widget w
Hey all,
Now that gtk+ depends on glitz, I'd like to see an OpenGL widget make
its way in to the gtk+ core. I am interested in seeing gtkglarea be
used as the base of that widget, since its footprint is small and would
be easy to maintain. I'd prefer to put my time in to building the
widget in t
