the function, so it has to be something
in GtkBuilder and Menu Items or ?
So, anyone know what is going on here?
Also, I am running Ubuntu 11.04. When the window loads it is a generic
theme- It doesn't match my appearance theme choice. Anyone know what
is up with that?
--
Craig Bakalian craigbakal
Hi Allin,
Yes, Yes. I just read through this subject, or gleaned it. Is there an
code example of theme - ing in gtk3.0 anywhere in internet land?
Craig Bakalian
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:05 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Craig Bakalian wrote:
Also, I am running Ubuntu
this, but who on earth
left out a menu module of a gtk release?
--
Craig Bakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Hi,
I have been working hard to convert to 3!
I am getting this when I try to run my gtk+3.0 builds-
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module canberra-gtk-module
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module gnomesegvhandler
Any help is appreciated.
--
Craig Bakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net
gtk_builder_connect_signals_full? That is even more
hard work!
Is anybody out there having difficulty making the transition to gtk3 on
ubuntu 11.04 like I am having?
--
Craig Bakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list
there is no gtksourceview object at
all.
I guess the general question is, why are there so many conflicts with in
the development layer of gnome and ubuntu 11.04. Is it Unity?
Or is this a question for the ubuntu team, where and who ever they are?
--
Craig Bakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net
Hi Allin,
I don't think it was the grace of god in my old makefiles. It was an
older version of gcc on my hard drive. Thank you for all your help.
Craig Bakalian
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 21:36 -0500, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Craig Bakalian wrote:
Well call me a frog
to get them back?
--
Craig Bakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
reference to `gtk_main'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Any information would be appreciated!
--
Craig Bakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk
+-2.0? Use --debug.
And if they are what you expect do they define the symbols such as
gtk_main? Running pkg-config is indeed of no avail if the result is
not examined.
Yeti
I am not sure what you mean by .pc file and if I ask for gtk+-2.0.
--
Craig Bakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net
So are the libraries actually there?
ls -al /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0*
There should be a symlink, something like
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so - libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2000.1
(version numbers may differ). If not, you need to (re-)install
libgtk2.0-dev at least.
Allin Cottrell
This is
Well call me a frog. It worked. What the heck is going on? I gotta
change all my makefiles?
CC = gcc -g -O2 -Wall # or to taste
CFLAGS = `pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0`
LIBS = `pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0`
foo: foo.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o @$ $ $(LIBS)
Oops, that should be:
Hi,
I am using g_remove to remove some temporary files from the /tmp folder.
It is working as expected. Yet, gcc is complaining that I am making an
implicit declaration. What is up with this?
Craig Bakalian
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk
Hi,
I have gtk and glib as includes? Am I missing something? If there
wasn't the right include, the build would fail, further, the function
wouldn't remove the file.
Craig Bakalian
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 12:29 +, James Morris wrote:
On 17 February 2011 12:27, Craig Bakalian craigbakal
Hi David and KC,
The glib/gstdio.h did the trick. But it is odd behavior.
#include stdio.h was already in my includes.
Craig Bakalian
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 02:00 +0800, KC wrote:
Try to add include glib/gstdio.h
KC
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Craig Bakalian
craigbakal
to test/hack this. I
hate hacking. I wish we had more examples here in linux land!
I just thought it would be more efficient and quicker to send data
directly to lilypond instead of a file location.
Craig Bakalian
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo