Hi,
On 21/06/16 16:26, Peter Weber wrote:
> I don't see here an active discussion about Gtk+4.0[1]? So I'm trying to
> write about my thoughts, in a careful way. In the first moment, I thought
> this is a good idea and just the numbering is misleading. Stability is what
> developers want, we need
On 27/02/14 00:20, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi;
>
> you really cannot use GTK+ to write a window manager.
>
> to be absolutely, brutally honest with you, you should not write a
> window manager *at* *all* — not even a little one.
>
> if you want to experiment with window management policies, I s
Hi,
On 30/10/13 01:10, Michael Webster wrote:
> Apologies if this has been brought up already...
>
> This patch:
>
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/gtk/gtkmenu.c?id=01dc23cdec377c9d9897cc32bf28ec1d241b29fa
Is it just me or all these changes we've recently made are not 'deprecations'
b
Hi,
On 23/10/13 18:40, Colin Walters wrote:
> When I read this again I realized my previous mail had a bad tone...what
> I really wanted to say is:
Thanks for your answers. I didn't take them in a bad way at all.
> I think InstalledTests is a natural evolution of "make check" that is
> far more
Hi,
On 21/10/13 10:34, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> hi,
>
> GLib aims to work on a wide range of operating systems, but we have no
> good story for ensuring that this is the case. Mostly we do things for
> Linux and, if they are the sort of thing that may cause problems, we
> also check that they work o
On 15/06/10 11:01, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Well, not only GTK+, but presumably then also everything else under it
> in the stack, otherwise it would be a rather pointless exercise,
> wouldn't it? I am fairly sure it doesn't work out-of-the-box. I have
> never tried.
We build GTK+, GLib, Pango and C
On 15/06/10 09:26, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Not out-of-the-box currently, but working on that would be a better
> idea, and enabling statically building the GTK+ stack would have a
> better chance of getting upstream.
You can already build GTK+ statically, can't you? Or doesn't it work on Windows?
Hi,
On 09/06/10 00:49, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> • how to deal with gtk-requiring libraries, with regards to the API/ABI break
> - libraries will have to do an ABI bump to match the ABI bump in gtk
> - we need to communicate this on the various venues and remind the maintainers
> ACTION: mclasen to
