Fabian Keil wrote:
> Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote:
>
> > On 04/21/2011 02:44 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > > I haven't filed a bug report yet as it wasn't clear to me
> > > if the behaviour is actually considered a bug. If there's
> > >
Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 02:44 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > I haven't filed a bug report yet as it wasn't clear to me
> > if the behaviour is actually considered a bug. If there's
> > an agreement that the behaviour is a bug, I wouldn&#x
Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 09:42 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > I think even not showing a tooltip at all, or replacing the
> > text provided by the application with something like
> > "tooltip doesn't fit screen" would be a behaviour that is
Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 02:34 AM, Morten Welinder wrote:
> >> If you really want to safely pass a very long text,
> >> you will have to know the font (family and size) then check with stuff
> >> like pango_layout_set_text() and pango_layout_get_pixel_size().
The application
The attached example program (by Colin Leroy) passes a string
with a long "word" to gtk_widget_set_tooltip_text() which causes
a crash when the tooltip is supposed to be shown.
(gdb) r --sync
Starting program: /home/fk/kram/tooltip-crashes/long_tooltip_crash --sync
[New LWP 101212]
[New Thread 805
's current behaviour is a bug,
or if the described API violation is expected to cause
undefined behaviour which includes crashes.
Thanks for your input.
Fabian
From 2d3a68a47c20a7b375b2ffd4baac34089b9badd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Keil
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:30:53 +0200
Subject:
