In GNOME, we turned that setting off by default quite a long time ago.
Probably around 5-6 years at this point. So, if your application relied on
menus and buttons having icons, it would have broken in mid-GNOME2-era
GNOME.
Unless;
* one has been turning that setting on for the last 5-6
-settings-daemon/+bug/1228886
Ubuntu LTS will stay with Gtk+ 3.8
Make of that what you will.
John
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:17 PM, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
How does this intersect with the (also deprecated AIUI)
GtkSettings variables gtk-button-images and gtk
For posterity and google, there is also a working port of gtkglext to gtk3
https://github.com/tdz/gtkglext
John
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Nicolas Silva nical.si...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Tarnyko tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
Hi Vincent,
LE GARREC Vincent
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:17 PM, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
How does this intersect with the (also deprecated AIUI)
GtkSettings variables gtk-button-images and gtk-menu-images?
Will those settings be honored through the Gtk+-3 series?
Hi,
So this wasn't really
Hi,
How does this intersect with the (also deprecated AIUI)
GtkSettings variables gtk-button-images and gtk-menu-images?
Will those settings be honored through the Gtk+-3 series?
John
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 09:41 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi,
As some of you may have noticed we
If interested I can GTKfy the code and open a feature request in
bugzilla.
There are already existing bug reports for validation here
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446056
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50276
I think validation would be useful to have in Gtk too[1].
There's a couple of patches you need that are not yet upstreamed
(due to their ugly hack/wip status) in this branch:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
But then I saw
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/windows-devel-list/2012-July/msg0.html
Which confused me,
Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projects/gnome-windows/GTK+3/
from time to time... For now at least, once stable it'll go to
ftp.gnome.org :)
aside #1:
Did you/anyone check out the jhbuild-like build system the
[sorry for the resend, something ate my mail]
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 20:38 -0800, Christian Hergert wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 03:59 +0100, Benjamin Otte wrote:
PLOTS
This is my personal pet peeve. I often have something I'd like to
quickly plot in GTK, but it always ends up being more
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 20:38 -0800, Christian Hergert wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 03:59 +0100, Benjamin Otte wrote:
PLOTS
This is my personal pet peeve. I often have something I'd like to
quickly plot in GTK, but it always ends up being more complicated then
I thought, so I either stare
It takes a build description file like:
https://github.com/dieterv/pygtk-installer/blob/master/wix/2.24.0.win32.xml
downloads required files, extracts them, applies transformations if
requested,
repacks, etc until finally a .msi is produced.
It is currently capable of packaging zips from
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 22:22 +0200, Dieter Verfaillie wrote:
Hi,
Some time ago I've asked Tor how his Windows build environment
looked like and he shared everything to be able to recreate
it (thanks again!). The various mails we exchanged and the
resulting directory structure and scripts can
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 10:51 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 20:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com wrote:
libegg has lots of directories that have just a README saying how the
code has successfully moved
John
[1] http://github.com/nzjrs/pygtk/commits/gtk-3.0
[2] http://github.com/nzjrs/pygobject/tree/gtk-3.0
What's the status of this now? Is there every likely to be a pygtk
release for GTK+ 3?
I suspended the work during the large round of gtk+ breakage (rendering
cleanup
its Python bindings to PyGtk if the devs over there are willing.
Yip, that would be fine in theory (PyGtk). Could you please point me to
where the PyGtk code for this lives? I presume you are talking about
just the ige-mac-integration GtkOSXApplication bindings in GitHub?
PyGtk will not see
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Mike Emmel mike.em...@gmail.com wrote:
I just got the message on all the bug reports that the DirectFB
backend is being removed for 3.0.
First you waited too long to do it. I'm glad its finally removed.
For Google, and those that find this thread brings bad
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 01:48 +1200, John Stowers wrote:
Hi,
First of all, PyGI and GObject introspection is the way forward.
Now, that being said, it seems a little silly to spend all this effort
porting C apps in GNOME to gtk-3.0 only to see the first PyGtk app drag
back in the gtk-2.0
Hi,
First of all, PyGI and GObject introspection is the way forward.
Now, that being said, it seems a little silly to spend all this effort
porting C apps in GNOME to gtk-3.0 only to see the first PyGtk app drag
back in the gtk-2.0 libraries with import gtk.
So I spent a little time trying to
to the pages footers.
For what I want, Midori shows a news feed icon and when I click on it,
I see the URL of the feed. I expect other proper web browsers do
something similar.
But making it more visible with a link at the bottom of the page would
seem like a good idea. Indeed news feeds
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:59 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
(oh no, not this again)
I was looking at the variety of different methods that are now being
employed on different platforms (MacOSX, Hildon, etc.) to implement
global menubar type options, and was wondering if we couldn't get some
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 13:15 -0400, David Brigada wrote:
Hello,
I am currently developing an X-Y graph widget that I think could someday
be included in GTK+. I'd just like to get a little bit of feedback on
the design so that I don't start spinning my wheels in the wrong
direction. My
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 11:44 +0100, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
Ross Burton wrote:
Adding _NET_WM_CONTEXT_TOOLBAR sounds like it should be fairly simple to
do, especially with a GTK+ utility function to mark a toolbar as the
main toolbar.
The same can be done for menu-bar for os-x-likeness
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 15:16 -0400, Yu Feng wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry for the longlong delay after last time I talked about writing
the applets and stuffs.
Hi Yu,
You do not seem to have got much feedback on this, but I would like to
personally thank you for your continued persistance on this
Firefox seems to work fine, (as far as giuseppe told me), I tested
Acrobat reader and it crashed (I have installed just for the occasion
since I always used evince :) ). Maybe Acrobat should force RGB in the
code before realization.
If Firefox 3 works then gtkmozembed certainly doesnt.
If
Hey Guys,
I was wondering if any consensus was reached at the hackfest regarding a
canvas suitable for inclusion in Gtk+.
John
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
25 matches
Mail list logo
