On Mon, Dec 29, 2008, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
PPS. I'm attaching a small patch for some of the issues:
Note that glib/pcre/ is an embedded copy of the pcre lib; would be best
to send this part upstream, to the pcre developers.
--
Loïc Minier
have to
provide the real source files along with the rules to generate the
others; this could be anywhere, but it's best to keep them in the
tarball. (This is exactly the same thing as e.g. configure.in.)
--
Loïc Minier
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
Hmm, the *.png files for the documentation do not get installed anymore
for me; is this a problem of another app on my system or do other
people get this problem too?
There were some documentation updates, but I didn't spot any suspicious
change in the doc build files.
--
Loïc Minier
dev series
are at least API stable before pushing them to Debian experimental; is
this the case of Gtk+ 2.11.1?
--
Loïc Minier
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
API is
declared as stable (i.e. no change, no removal, but only additions).
--
Loïc Minier
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
, and let the
distributor build one from the list, or default to a non-legacy one for
Win32.
--
Loïc Minier
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
are handled.)
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
since bugs such as
http://bugs.debian.org/365524. The logic is in the cdbs package:
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk ]
--
Loïc Minier
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel
of GTK.
Seriously though, I think it's obsolete by nowadays standards. Plus it
fails to build in the doc. :)
--
Loïc Minier
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
of ~/.subversion/config and call a real diff binary in
my-diff instead of the builtin.
--
Loïc Minier
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
of your patch?
Also, did you valgrind your test case? It should immediately point at
the place where memory is leaked from I suppose.
Thanks,
PS: I'm subscribed to the list
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forget your stupid theme park! I'm gonna make my own! With hookers!
And blackjack
-directfb.c
gtk+2.0-2.10.4/gdk/directfb/Makefile.am
)
Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a
major GTK relase, like (i guess) is done for X and win32 backends?
Would be nice.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED
-directfb.c
gtk+2.0-2.10.4/gdk/directfb/Makefile.am
)
Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a
major GTK relase, like (i guess) is done for X and win32 backends?
Would be nice.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED
13 matches
Mail list logo