On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 03:37:41AM +0200, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
> I will upload all scripts to Git as soon as I get my account
> approved.
What steps did you take? I did not get any voucher request for
'bugzilla.gnome.org'.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
gt
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:05:07AM +0200, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>
> >It would be better if you could check in your scripts in a repository, so
> >one could more easily study and eventually contribute to your effort. All
> >the binaries should be fetched or build fr
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:53:37PM +0200, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
> I won't debate this again, points have already been widely made
> before (Bernhard does have some here). Personally, what I regret the
> most is having spent time writing a useless patch. It does imply
> something for my past an
Please attach it to a bug on https://bugzilla.gnome.org/.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Wondering if you also looked at iOS and Android.
Ignore this, you obviously did.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mail
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:23:40AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> A new api
[..]
> Portability considerations
>
> - Most of the GtkNotification api can probably be implemented against
> org.freedesktop.Notifications (except the fire-and-forget aspects),
> and this is what I think we should start
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:22:51AM +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:30 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > - We want to discuss major API proposals or wishes (eg new widgets) on
> > this mailing list, instead of just in bugzilla.
>
> That's terrific. While I wouldn't say that b
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:16:31PM +, Matthew Bucknall wrote:
> Is it possible to make a GtkNotebook show its action widgets when it
> contains no tabs? If not, I'll file a bug because it seems silly to
> effectively prevent having 'Add Tab' type buttons in the action areas.
Suggest to just fi
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 09:43:12PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> It happens sometimes, and it usually causes crashes. It's nice to avoid
> it even if it's rare.
Could this somehow be automatically be checked by make distcheck? And I
mean automatic that it is somehow added by "gnome-autogen.sh" so
How can those app menus be translated? Is anyone on the gnome-i18n
mailing list?
--
Regards,
Olav
--- Begin Message ---
Hi guys,
I'm sure many of you have heard of the new 3.4 feature, application
menu [1]. There is one problem with it from the i18n perspective: app
menus are not translatable. Af
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:28:55AM +0200, Kean Johnston wrote:
> Please can glib devs give https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660761
> a little love? Its been a month and a half since I posted the last
> patch and there has been no traction on it.
Suggestion: Best to always copy/paste the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:52:26PM -0700, stu...@zulazon.com wrote:
> I think it should be possible for someone unfamiliar with either package
> to build glib from source after reading INSTALL, before installing
> pkg-config. Either that, or to install pkg-config before installing glib
I guess yo
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:19:45PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 8 September 2011 23:42, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:38:02AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> >> And the fact that I'm here shows that I agree. Shawn was here (until
> >> Olaf
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:38:02AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> And the fact that I'm here shows that I agree. Shawn was here (until
> Olaf kicked him off this morning) for the same reason. I'm quite
Shawn kicked himself off.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
gtk-deve
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:34:59PM -0400, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
> Emmanuel
I understand you care about Jeff, and though I believe the initial
message could be worded differently, I have to say:
* pot calling the kettle black regarding tone on the mailing list
* you're now banned from gtk-dev
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:28:21PM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> The rest of Gtk-OSX isn't Gtk. It's a build system using jhbuild with
> its own modulesets, a python script for making application bundles,
> and a few other bits and pieces, including gtk-quartz-engine, a Cocoa
> HIT theme engine which
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:09:55PM +0200, dieterv wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:54:16 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> >can you explain what you require in terms of infrastructure?
>
> For the continuing maintenance of GTK+ 2.24.X only (binaries that
> are supposed to be completely compatible with
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:37:15PM -0500, Shawn Amundson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > I would like that too, but in retrospect, I found out that Tim Janik
> > (ironically) has root access to the machine too - so it's less of an issue
> > now.
>
>
> A few pe
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:09:11AM +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> In any case, what worries me the most is bandwidth usage (though I
> don't have any numbers), it seems weird to me that we are moving away
> from tar.gz/bz2 to save bandwidth and still we waste so much bandwidth
> cloning gtk3/2/gdk-pi
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:06:32PM +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> I am looking for comments from git experts on any of the operations
> I'm doing and how feasible would be to rewrite the git.gnome.org
> repository. The resulting repository can be found in my github
> site[0].
Any git experts who can
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:30:33PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> can we remove n...@naver.com from the list? everytime i send a message
> to gtk-devel, his mail server refuses my message and sends me back a
> message telling me this. i don't care, and i think its rude. does this
> happen to anyone els
Is it ok if I create a doap file in the gtk+ repository?
MAINTAINERS file isn't really needed. I wouldn't remove that, but doap
file allows me to specify a some other things like mailing lists,
homepage, description and so on.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
gtk-d
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 05:43:02PM +0100, Stef Bon wrote:
> I'm trying to build the latest version of gobject-introspection. I've
> got it with git.
>
> It's complaining there is no gnome-autogen found. Well that's right,
> but do I have to install these first It should be optional.
Use a tar
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:14:16AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Well, I think the easiest thing is to explain at the top of each
> version, like I did for 3. Though now that library can parallel
> display the two I need to update it to say GTK+ 2 is at /gtk and GTK3
> is at /gtk3.
Perhaps easies
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 10:38 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 21 October 2010 17:44, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > devhelp won't compile because WebKitGTK wasn't ported.
> >
> > and:
> >
> > dh-assistant.c: In function 'assistant_
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 01:07:15PM +0200, "Andrés G. Aragoneses" wrote:
> Another good thing to do after that is deploying the codeformatter in
> the server as a hook for any commit, so users don't need to run it.
This is impossible with distributed version control.
Hooks can only contain policy,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:56:12AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> It's now on Sourceforge because when Richard decided with his partner
> wind up Imendio and to withdraw from Gtk+, he asked on his forum for
> someone to take over maintaining the build system. I bit, and after
> some probing discovered
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:10:58PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Yeah, I get it, but here's the point: it isn't nice when a maintainer
> says "unlikely" without giving even one reason, leaving the rest of us
> to guess (EG, "that's most likely the reason").
Can we stop this discussion now o
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:31:03PM +0200, Daniel Elstner wrote:
> Arguing that the exact value isn't important, but then insisting on the
> 1024 convention just seems silly to me. Either it is important or it
> isn't. In those situation where the difference matters, you need to
> know the factor.
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:07:30PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> I've got a local branch with the rebased client-side-windows work.
> However, I am unable to push it to git.gnome.org due to the pre-commit
> hooks:
>
> The following translation (.po) file appears to be invalid. (When
> updating
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 01:56:05PM +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Worked on fifth-or-so attempt, must have been a temporary server glitch.
You likely have a (transparent) proxy with multiple IP addresses. Don't
limit the login to your IP address when logging in.
--
Regards,
Olav
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:10:13PM +0200, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
> >Vala is a high level language which is translated to GObject and C, so
> >you are proposing to rewrite GObject using GObject.
>
> Vala can be modified, since it is open source and all. I'm not sure if
> that's feasible though, a
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:33:19AM +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> Things are looking very nice now. There are very few testcase failures,
> and with the last fixes to the native window code we're able to run
> firefox with no obvious problems.
First gio/gvfs, now this :-)
--
Regards,
Olav
___
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:22:59AM -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> a) We *always* use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as "QA Contact" for components.
>
> b) We *always* use a @gnome.bugs alias as the "Default Assignee" for
> all Gtk+ components, using
> a standard, for instance: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note that you cou
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:00:59PM +0200, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
> Look at what you did, Yevgen Muntyan. Not only you're an evildoer and
> a hijacker who wants a canvas widget, but because you're so cruel, you
> made the little Emmanuele cry and leave. You will now be sent to hell
> and allowed to
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:03:09PM +0200, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
> is worth it or not. If the GLib/GTK+ maintainers believe that selling
> an ABI breakage and a major release with just "we've mangled fields;
> we've removed deprecated cruft" is ambitious enough, then who am I
> oppose.
Please cut
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:38:15AM +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Now it is hosted on library.gnome.org I would guess it is generated
> automatically from the source + docbook? I don't actually know. Anyone
> care to fill us in, we have someone ready and willing to update it :)
Library uses tarbal
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:48:10PM +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > Blogged!
> > http://blogs.gnome.org/gtk/2008/04/02/glib-2162-released/
>
> Well, the tarballs are still not available as of today though :-)
>
> http://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/2.16/ lists 2.16.1 as the latest,
> and no 2.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:19:52PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Note that, technically, the release team doesn't have any control power
> on glib. Nice to ask, though :-)
Addition: Please ensure all affected modules are fixed before the
tarballs are made (Monday 23:59 UTC at the latest) + docs (et
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:26:33PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > This link will have to be kept up to date, if this is the link to use,
> > it would be better to have a more permanent link that doesn't change
> > with new versions of GNOME (which we used to have).
>
> Theoretically,
> http://w
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:30:14PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/download-linux.html
> > * outdated versions
>
> You disagree? It might not make sense to list unsupported versions here
> I agree, but we should definitely list older versions.
No, I me
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
>
> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
>
> The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If
FYI. A bit amazing.
--
Regards,
Olav
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
It seems that the GTK 1.2 documentation has been deprecated from your
site. This is a bit of a problem for those of us that are still having
to use it.
It would be extremely handy to have an archive section, maybe of
tarballs of old
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:25:16AM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> I must confess, I have quite limited knowledge when it comes to our
> hosting services for GNOME and GTK+ (i.e. where machines are hosted
> physically and who looks after them, etc - is this information available
> somewhere?). Perha
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:13:20PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> So could you now please redirect
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/
done.
> I'd then like to remove this directory from svn:
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/web-devel-2/trunk/content/doc/API/
It won't be removed from the server
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 06:38:29PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 22:27 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:31:52PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > If nobody objects within a week I'll make this change.
> >
> >
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:31:52PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> If nobody objects within a week I'll make this change.
As GNOME Library is now good enough to redirect the existing pages. I've
added the following redirects to developer.gnome.org:
RedirectMatch permanent ^/doc/A
GTK+ is the main user of the developer API reference with links from:
http://www.gtk.org/api/
I want to redirect:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/
to:
http://library.gnome.org/developer/
See for instance the GTK+ API reference on:
http://library.gnome.org/developers/gtk/2.11/
Note
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> * are people in the foundation sponsoring a conf call for the team?
The board uses the Sun conference call system. If allowed for gtk+, one
person has to set it up (forgot who) and then everyone should be able to
call in (for fre
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:08:10AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> It'd be useful to know how many more people are needed to have things
> working more smoothly. Let's talk about full-time people: would 2 people
> be enough? Or do we need much more than 2, like 8 full-time developers?
> This is the ki
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:01:31PM -0700, Mike Emmel wrote:
> I just reported a bug on the directfb backend and bugzilla did not send me
> mail.
> Not sure if its because I was the one that reported it or I'm not
> getting mail for all directb flagged bugs.
IIRC by default it doesn't send mail fo
51 matches
Mail list logo
