Il giorno dom, 23/06/2013 alle 17.35 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom ha
scritto:
> [...]
> I have a feeling that your requirements are... falling into that pitfall,
> i.e. the height-for-width requesting algorithms don't fit cleanly into
> what we report to the X server as minimum sizes for width and hei
PM, Pietro Battiston
> wrote:
> > Il giorno mer, 19/06/2013 alle 20.03 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom ha
> > scritto:
> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Pietro Battiston
> >> wrote:
> >> >[...]
> >> > This is, to my eyes, the clearest example of
Il giorno mer, 19/06/2013 alle 20.03 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom ha
scritto:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Pietro Battiston
> wrote:
> >[...]
> > This is, to my eyes, the clearest example of height-for-width space
> > management... and as far as I understand, it
Il giorno mer, 19/06/2013 alle 13.40 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom ha
scritto:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Pietro Battiston
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > If I'm honest about the minimum width, then the (corresponding) minimum
> > height required is assumed to be someth
Dear developers,
I've written a plugin. It is a simple WrapBox, similar to the one which
was for some time in gtk2 (or at least I think so - I did not actually
see it working, only read some mails about it). I tell you this only to
make you grasp an idea of how magically such a plugin can benefit
Il giorno gio, 15/01/2009 alle 16.41 -0500, Havoc Pennington ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> > I already considered my doubt as answered (see below), but I disagree
> > with what you say: if you call size_request "minimu
Il giorno gio, 15/01/2009 alle 09.41 -0500, Havoc Pennington ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston :
> >
> > the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says:
> >
> > "Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a
Il giorno gio, 15/01/2009 alle 08.55 +0200, Kalle Vahlman ha scritto:
> So while setting sensible minimum sizes and constraining maximum by
> ellipsation or scrolled container for your *widgets* makes totally
> sense (to ensure the application will be usable on the first run),
> taking over the win
Il giorno mer, 14/01/2009 alle 23.00 +0200, Markku Vire ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> 0On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 17:00 +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> >
> > > Forcibly clipping window size would anyway only be band-aid to the
> > > real problem in the application, which
Il giorno mer, 14/01/2009 alle 17.20 +0200, Kalle Vahlman ha scritto:
> 2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston :
> > I would have filed a bug (asking for windows to clip to screen when
> > their their size_request is too big*), but it's obviously a major issue,
> > so obviously it
Il giorno mer, 14/01/2009 alle 15.19 +0200, markku.v...@iki.fi ha
scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Pietro Battiston :
>
> > the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says:
> >
> > "Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a
&g
otice that - still as far as I know - getting a window, or a contained
widget, to take the available space without overflowing the screen is
_very_ tricky.)
Pietro Battiston
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
