for reminding, I had totally missed the announcements.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
of APIs and things like that.
Lets just say: don't do that ?
Sounds like a perfectly valid use-case to me so shouldn't the
question rather be Why not?.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Tristan Van Berkom t...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Reading through planet gnome and related mailing-lists recently, I
got the impression that this would be a good time to port my
and referenced (by object
type property) in GtkBuilder format.
That is gone too now with a fresh conversion using glade3 so I am
afraid, we might never find out. :) Thanks again.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing
))
Aborted
The error from the third UI says a bit more so i think i can debug
that on my own, but what is this supposed to mean?
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http
Hi everyone!
I have opened a new bug for the support of light-weight objects:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553794 . I am writing this
mail to inform the busy hackers who don't lurk on IRC and are
interested. :)
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
of the objects
it needs. So when you set a new child on a GtkBox object, the GtkBox
must unref the old child widget.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali Khattak
FSF member#5124
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
