On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 14:27 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
On 06.09.2005 15:08, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 23:25 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
[...]
Also gtkstatusicon-x11.c not only implements the fdo spec but it also
defines a bunch of status icon api. Not only 21 functions but
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 01:38 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Hans Breuer writes:
BTW: I'd appreciate if somebody with a deeper understanding of gtk
internals
could do a review of gtktrayicon-win32.c. Maybe what I've done is
considered
too much of a hack ;-)
I appreciate your work, but
On 19.09.2005 00:38, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Hans Breuer writes:
BTW: I'd appreciate if somebody with a deeper understanding of gtk internals
could do a review of gtktrayicon-win32.c. Maybe what I've done is considered
too much of a hack ;-)
I appreciate your work, but why the rush?
Isn't
On 06.09.2005 15:08, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 23:25 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
[...]
Also gtkstatusicon-x11.c not only implements the fdo spec but it also
defines a bunch of status icon api. Not only 21 functions but additionally
quite some properties. Should all this be
On 18.09.2005 14:27, Hans Breuer wrote:
[...]
Before diving too deep into the code of (now) gtkstatusicon.c I've tried
it on Linux - but it does not work there, too. What am I supposed to
update so see any effect of ./teststatusicon ? (I'm running gnome-2.10.2
on gentoo with xorg-x11-6.8.2)
Hans Breuer writes:
BTW: I'd appreciate if somebody with a deeper understanding of gtk internals
could do a review of gtktrayicon-win32.c. Maybe what I've done is considered
too much of a hack ;-)
I appreciate your work, but why the rush?
Isn't it better to wait some time and let the X11
