Shouldn't GdkGC be deprecated now that we have cairo contexts?
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
I agree but it doesn't sound really easy as GtkStyle holds a number of GdkGCs for the style colors.I am currently unaware of whether the style engines access them directly but i'd rather think they do, so this would require the style engines to 1) only use the GdkColors of the style and ("while we'
> I agree but it doesn't sound really easy as GtkStyle holds a number of
> GdkGCs for the style colors.
So, I guess that should be ported too.
In general, deprecation doesn't mean that you may not use it. Deprecation
is n't breaking.
> I am currently unaware of whether the style engines access
Yes, that's what i meant by "deprecation by policy" (i.e. you'd say it's deprecated, but don't remove the code or anything, you just discourage it's use; although that might be not the proper word for it, i'm sorry in that case as i'm not a native english speaker)
The problem is just there are a do
And in addition all current style engines would need to be ported, since once the GdkGCs are declared as deprecated, it would as a consequence deprecate the styles engine's code as well.
On 12/1/05, milosz derezynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, that's what i meant by "deprecation by policy" (i.
One first step could be to back all gdk_draw_*() functions with actual cairo drawing (disabling antialiasing so compatibility is kept) and reading only the color values off the GCs, and then officially deprecate the GdkGCs.
(Not entirely sure if that makes sense, RFC)That way at least the GdkGCs wo
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:50 +0100, milosz derezynski wrote:
> I agree but it doesn't sound really easy as GtkStyle holds a number of
> GdkGCs for the style colors.
... and apps still do this:
gdk_gc_set_clip_rectangle (widget->style->black_gc, &my_rect);
gdk_draw_pixbuf (widget->window,
Well, i volunteer for this. I have used cairo extensively for coding bmpx and i'm going to get to a very good point in documenting at least all the equivalents of gdk_draw_*()Federico: In which format should i write this, anything that would be preferred?
PS: I've created a bug (http://bugzilla.gno
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 09:43 +0100, milosz derezynski wrote:
> Well, i volunteer for this. I have used cairo extensively for coding
> bmpx and i'm going to get to a very good point in documenting at least
> all the equivalents of gdk_draw_*()
>
> Federico: In which format should i write this, anyth
On 12/2/05, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 09:43 +0100, milosz derezynski wrote:> Well, i volunteer for this. I have used cairo extensively for coding> bmpx and i'm going to get to a very good point in documenting at least> all the equivalents of gdk_draw_*(
I just saw you've added it to the 2.10 API freeze, well i'm not sure it (the patch) can be kept as it is but i strongly favor that we have a function with this name that does the same that gdk_cairo_set_source_pixbuf () does (so that you can use cairo operations to draw a drawable onto a drawable).
Ok i've started writing it, there are a few FIXMEs which i might resolve myself during writing, gotta ask cworth about it.The document is located and will be for the time being (unless we convert it to doxygen/gtk-doc in the meantime) here:
http://beep-media-player.org/~mderezynski/cairo.txtMiloszO
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 09:43 +0100, milosz derezynski wrote:
> Well, i volunteer for this. I have used cairo extensively for coding
> bmpx and i'm going to get to a very good point in documenting at least
> all the equivalents of gdk_draw_*()
>
> Federico: In which format should i write this, anyth
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 03:28 +0100, milosz derezynski wrote:
> http://beep-media-player.org/~mderezynski/cairo.txt
Fantastic. I've started adding DocBook markup to this, and will commit
it to the GTK+ docs when I'm done with that.
Milosz, if you make changes to your text, could you please forwar
14 matches
Mail list logo
