Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Owen Taylor writes:
> There is a third possible issue - if you are moving another window over
> a window, does windows send:
>
> ERASEBKGND
> ERASEBKGND
> ERASEBKGND
> PAINT
>
> Or is ERASEBKGN only sent immediately before PAINT?
If I understand correctly, WM_E
Owen Taylor writes:
> There is a third possible issue - if you are moving another window over
> a window, does windows send:
>
> ERASEBKGND
> ERASEBKGND
> ERASEBKGND
> PAINT
>
> Or is ERASEBKGN only sent immediately before PAINT?
If I understand correctly, WM_ERASEBKGND is sent whe
John Ehresman writes:
> There's a patch for this at
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144269
Ah yes, thanks for the pointer... I should have remembered that there
already was discussion in bugzilla about WM_ERASEBKGND.
--tml
___
gtk-devel
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
It was suggested to me on IRC that it is unnecessary (thanks!), and it
indeed seems so.
There's a patch for this at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144269 It's definitely needed
to eliminate flickering when widgets are interactively resized. There
were issues wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| A typical win32 double-buffering program
| may do nothing with WM_ERASEBKGND but return with a non-zero.
s/double-buffering program/program that uses backing store/
erase_background() is one of the source of flickering (e.g. during
toplevel resize).
-
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 07:46 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 12:53 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > It was suggested to me on IRC that it is unnecessary (thanks!), and it
> > indeed seems so.
> >
> > But anyway, before I zap it, a request to fellow gtk/win32 hackers:
> > Please ver
Owen Taylor writes:
> You certainly can't do that on windows that don't have have expose
> events in their event mask, since they'll never get repainted.
Note the suggestion isn't doing anything to the WM_PAINT handling.
Can you think of some test corner cases in gtk-demo, testgtk or
elsewhere?
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 12:53 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> It was suggested to me on IRC that it is unnecessary (thanks!), and it
> indeed seems so.
>
> But anyway, before I zap it, a request to fellow gtk/win32 hackers:
> Please verify. Comment out the WM_ERASEBKGND case in gdkevents-win32.c:
> gd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| But anyway, before I zap it, a request to fellow gtk/win32 hackers:
| Please verify. Comment out the WM_ERASEBKGND case in gdkevents-win32.c:
| gdk_event_translate().
My local copy of the gtk+ binary which is used to debug Gnumeric/Win32
has erase_bac
It was suggested to me on IRC that it is unnecessary (thanks!), and it
indeed seems so.
But anyway, before I zap it, a request to fellow gtk/win32 hackers:
Please verify. Comment out the WM_ERASEBKGND case in gdkevents-win32.c:
gdk_event_translate().
(Please test in the gtk-2-6 branch, as the HEA
10 matches
Mail list logo
