And the patch is here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562244
2008/10/7 BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello good people,
>
> I think there should be a contract that all subclasses of GtkContainer
> must implement. Conceptually, a container is a collection of
> widgets. Usually
2008/10/8 Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:52 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
>> In the future (3.0 maybe?) it would be cool if there was a Sequence
>> interface that container widgets could implement. That way it would be
>> more explicit how containers should be impleme
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:52 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> In the future (3.0 maybe?) it would be cool if there was a Sequence
> interface that container widgets could implement. That way it would be
> more explicit how containers should be implemented. And other
> list-like widgets could also imp
Hello good people,
I think there should be a contract that all subclasses of GtkContainer
must implement. Conceptually, a container is a collection of
widgets. Usually that collection is implemented as a list but it does
not have to be [1]. This means that:
1. The order child widgets are stored i
