>does this make? there is no reason why software from the year 2006
>needs to be compiled with compilers from the year 1986.
cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-09 2004/03/31
That does not look like a compiler from 1986 to me. I said we disable c99
features for internal reasons. When you are dealing with
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:42 -0500, ANDREW PAPROCKI, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN
wrote:
> >does this make? there is no reason why software from the year 2006
> >needs to be compiled with compilers from the year 1986.
>
> cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-09 2004/03/31
>
> That does not look like a compiler from
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:06, Michael Natterer wrote:
> So what about just opening up that code and see how fast it will be
> fixed?
Unless I have missed something, his code is (L)GPLed because he doesn't
use glib/gtk as shared libraries.
Xav
___
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:17 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:06, Michael Natterer wrote:
>
> > So what about just opening up that code and see how fast it will be
> > fixed?
>
> Unless I have missed something, his code is (L)GPLed because he doesn't
> use glib/gtk as shared
