Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

2009/11/9 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk: Hey Mikkel, Sorry for not replying sooner! On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:23 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: Attached is a series of patches (0001 should be identical to my previous) implementing what you describe, except adding the gboolean

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

Hey Mikkel, Sorry for not replying sooner! On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:23 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: Attached is a series of patches (0001 should be identical to my previous) implementing what you describe, except adding the gboolean enumerated arg to @introspect and @dispatch. I

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

2009/10/28 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: 2009/10/27 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: 2009/10/27 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk: Hey Mikkel, On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: I just looked over the newly introduced

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

2009/10/28 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: 2009/10/28 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: 2009/10/27 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: 2009/10/27 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk: Hey Mikkel, On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

2009/10/27 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk: Hey Mikkel, On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: I just looked over the newly introduced g_dbus_connection_register_subtree() and related data structures, and I think it will fit very nicely with what I am going to

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

2009/10/27 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: 2009/10/27 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk: Hey Mikkel, On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: I just looked over the newly introduced g_dbus_connection_register_subtree() and related data structures,

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

2009/10/25 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com: 2009/10/15 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk: Hey Mikkel, On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:24 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:  * Can I register a GDBusInterfaceVTable without registering an object? The use case I have in mind is

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

Hey Mikkel, On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: I just looked over the newly introduced g_dbus_connection_register_subtree() and related data structures, and I think it will fit very nicely with what I am going to need. All in all it looks really sweet,

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

2009/10/15 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk: Hey Mikkel, On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:24 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:  * Can I register a GDBusInterfaceVTable without registering an object? The use case I have in mind is something akin to dynamically spawning objects on the server side

GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

2009/10/15 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk: Hey, At the GNOME summit this weekend, Ryan Lortie, Matthias Clasen, Will Thompson and myself had a hallway conversation about how to get D-Bus functionality into the GLib stack. This mail is an attempt at summarizing what we talked about. Thanks for

Re: GDBus API Questions; was: GDBus/GVariant plans for next GLib release

Hey Mikkel, On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:24 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: * Can I register a GDBusInterfaceVTable without registering an object? The use case I have in mind is something akin to dynamically spawning objects on the server side when messages are send to objects under a