2011/3/7 Matthias Clasen :
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
> wrote:
>
>> b.) It's damn easy to make GApplication at least startup
>> correctly, run the main loop and just not use any IPC,
>> it's the least I think that one can expect.
>
> Then lets the patch already
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> b.) It's damn easy to make GApplication at least startup
> correctly, run the main loop and just not use any IPC,
> it's the least I think that one can expect.
Then lets the patch already, instead of needlessly prolonging thi
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:52 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On 2011-03-07 at 18:40, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> > Will use of GtkApplication cause my app to simply fail just because
> > a win32/osx implementation is missing ? or will it silently succeed ?
>
> there is nothing X11-specific in GAppl
On 2011-03-07 at 18:40, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Will use of GtkApplication cause my app to simply fail just because
> a win32/osx implementation is missing ? or will it silently succeed ?
there is nothing X11-specific in GApplication or GtkApplication.
in fact, if you install D-Bus on OSX or
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 16:48 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
> wrote:
>
> >
> > As I mentioned before, I'm not asking for an implementation on win32
> > of GtkApplication, I'm just asking for it to succeed, run a mainloop
> > and "do something" as
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> a.) GtkApplication only available as GtkX11Application is acceptable,
> because people only expect it to work on x11 (the actual stubs
> should in this case only be created on x11 and the docs should
> mention that it an x11-
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
>
> As I mentioned before, I'm not asking for an implementation on win32
> of GtkApplication, I'm just asking for it to succeed, run a mainloop
> and "do something" as a fallback for a missing implementation.
So, you are not asking for an
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 16:08 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 10:37 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
>
> > ... do I have to pull out that change while
> > GApplication is still unstable ?
>
> GApplication is not un
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 10:37 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> ... do I have to pull out that change while
> GApplication is still unstable ?
GApplication is not unstable.
It is true that after all the back-and-forth, nobody has gotten aro
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 10:37 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Paul Davis
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:00 AM, David Zeuthen wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just for the record, there's no reason that GDBus cannot be made to
> >> work very nicely on Win
Hey,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:00 AM, David Zeuthen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just for the record, there's no reason that GDBus cannot be made to
>> work very nicely on Win32 or any other platform we care about. GDBus
>> (and D-Bus itself) was des
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:00 AM, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just for the record, there's no reason that GDBus cannot be made to
> work very nicely on Win32 or any other platform we care about. GDBus
> (and D-Bus itself) was designed with this goal in mind.
what functionality is (G)D-Bus supp
Hi,
Just for the record, there's no reason that GDBus cannot be made to
work very nicely on Win32 or any other platform we care about. GDBus
(and D-Bus itself) was designed with this goal in mind.
That is to say, it is possible to make a Win32 build of GLib where
GDBus works as expect in both pee
13 matches
Mail list logo
