On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 20:47 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I thought the same, but failed to find any traces
> of this discussion in ChangeLogs or mails.
We discussed this in Kristiansand :)
Federico
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@g
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 18:01 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
> > :-) Either way - there is a workaround now; and as Federico says prolly
> >going via the environment is a more robust & cleaner solution.
>
> The only issue with using the environment is that it is inherited by
> child processes.
michael meeks wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:04 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
>
>>I have vague memory that modules not getting arguments is intentional
>>rather than an oversight ... that we discussed it at the point of the
>>GOption switch and decided it was fundamentally busted and
>>unsupport
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:04 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> I have vague memory that modules not getting arguments is intentional
> rather than an oversight ... that we discussed it at the point of the
> GOption switch and decided it was fundamentally busted and
> unsupportable.
>
> I may just be inv
> > >
> I have vague memory that modules not getting arguments is intentional
> rather than an oversight ... that we discussed it at the point of the
> GOption switch and decided it was fundamentally busted and
> unsupportable.
>
> I may just be inventing that memory...
>
> Regards,
>
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 16:42 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On 2/7/06, michael meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:24 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately - the introduction of GOption clobbered all
> > > > GtkModule
> > > > argument passing; an
On 2/7/06, michael meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:24 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > Unfortunately - the introduction of GOption clobbered all
> > > GtkModule
> > > argument passing; and ensures that no GtkModule gets anything but a
> > > 0/NULL argc/argv
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:36 +, michael meeks wrote:
> * we have to propagate the pipe name / argument to the
> child process via a (presumably reliable) environment
> variable instead of an argument.
I'd favor this. We are trying to move away from having libraries which
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:36, michael meeks wrote:
> Hi there,... Bill - I'm slightly amazed we havn't
> seen this before - whatsup there ? :-)
Well, I suspect that the Gnome HEAD a11y bits haven't gotten much
exercise until lately. Fortunately that's changing, at least on the Sun
end of things -
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:24 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Unfortunately - the introduction of GOption clobbered all GtkModule
> > argument passing; and ensures that no GtkModule gets anything but a
> > 0/NULL argc/argv cf.
>
> Looks like this is a bug that got introduced when we first
On 2/7/06, michael meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> So - I've been chasing a rather interesting bug:
>
> "GNOME hangs on login with a11y enabled"
>
> Of course - clobbering the proximate cause: gnome-session activating
> vino-server synchronously wor
Hi there,
So - I've been chasing a rather interesting bug:
"GNOME hangs on login with a11y enabled"
Of course - clobbering the proximate cause: gnome-session activating
vino-server synchronously works around this nicely; but there is a
deeper problem:
Wh
12 matches
Mail list logo
