On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 18:23 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Matthew Bucknall
> wrote:
>
> > What I'm not clear on is the meaning of the 'natural' arguments in
> > calls to gtk_widget_get_preferred_height () and
> > gtk_widget_get_preferred_width ().
> >
> > Are the nat
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Matthew Bucknall
wrote:
> What I'm not clear on is the meaning of the 'natural' arguments in
> calls to gtk_widget_get_preferred_height () and
> gtk_widget_get_preferred_width ().
>
> Are the natural sizes just some sort hint to containers which may
> result in mo
On 25 September 2011 23:07, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Matthew Bucknall
> wrote:
>> I'm trying to get my head around GTK+ 3.0's new 'Height-for-width
>> Geometry Management'. Sorry if I'm missing it in the documentation
>&
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Matthew Bucknall
wrote:
> I'm trying to get my head around GTK+ 3.0's new 'Height-for-width
> Geometry Management'. Sorry if I'm missing it in the documentation
> somewhere, but what exactly is the definition of a widget's
I'm trying to get my head around GTK+ 3.0's new 'Height-for-width
Geometry Management'. Sorry if I'm missing it in the documentation
somewhere, but what exactly is the definition of a widget's natural
width or height?
___
g
