From: "Davyd Madeley", Date: 04/06/2009 10:59, Wrote:
>> I haven't tried this, but unless I am mistaken this should reverse the
>> order of children in a box. Seems easy enough to do and avoids the need
>> to introduce yet another special case in the GtkBox code. Perhaps if
>> this solution is not
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 19:56 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> what's so painful about:
>
> GList *list = gtk_container_get_children (GTK_CONTAINER (box));
> gint pos = g_list_length (list) - 1;
>
> for (; list; list = list->next, pos--)
> gtk_box_reorder_child (GTK_BOX (box), list->data, pos);
>
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
[...]
>
> I haven't tried this, but unless I am mistaken this should reverse the
> order of children in a box. Seems easy enough to do and avoids the need
> to introduce yet another special case in the GtkBox code. Perhaps if
> this solution is n
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:32 -0400, Freddie Unpenstein wrote:
> From: "Tristan Van Berkom", Date: 04/06/2009 00:13, Wrote:
>
> >> In general though, GtkOrientable already exists. People are bound
> to
> >> use it.
> > An example use case of this would be a custom toolbar that could be
> > plac
From: "Tristan Van Berkom", Date: 04/06/2009 00:13, Wrote:
>> In general though, GtkOrientable already exists. People are bound to
>> use it.
> An example use case of this would be a custom toolbar that could be
> placed optionally on top or on the side of the workspace where the tool
> ordering i
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Davyd Madeley wrote:
[...]
>
> In general though, GtkOrientable already exists. People are bound to use
> it.
>
An example use case of this would be a custom toolbar that could be
placed optionally on top or on the side of the workspace where the tool
ordering is r
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:09 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 19:03 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
>
> > It's not really related to GtkOrientable per se, but it's specifically
> > that when you change the runtime orientation you might also wish to
> > reverse the packing order (I gu
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 19:03 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> It's not really related to GtkOrientable per se, but it's specifically
> that when you change the runtime orientation you might also wish to
> reverse the packing order (I guess think about wishing to do a -90
> degree rotation rather
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:55 +0200, Christian Dywan wrote:
> how is this related to GtkOrientable at all? This was always
> how a vertical box worked, ever since GtkVBox was there. There is
> nothing new with it.
>
> I'm afraid I don't see how Gtk could help you out, if what you
> need really is a
Am Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:18:17 +0800
schrieb Davyd Madeley :
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:08 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:25 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> > > I was experimenting with using GtkOrientable today and came
> > > across what might be an oversight whe
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:08 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:25 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> > I was experimenting with using GtkOrientable today and came across what
> > might be an oversight when using it with GtkBox'like objects.
> >
> > I wanted to turn a hbox in
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:25 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> I was experimenting with using GtkOrientable today and came across what
> might be an oversight when using it with GtkBox'like objects.
>
> I wanted to turn a hbox into a vbox, which is fine. However the buttons
> in the box are then c
I was experimenting with using GtkOrientable today and came across what
might be an oversight when using it with GtkBox'like objects.
I wanted to turn a hbox into a vbox, which is fine. However the buttons
in the box are then clearly in the reverse order to the one that makes
sense.
This can be h
13 matches
Mail list logo
