On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:29 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:35 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > This was previously discussed here, but was sort of hidden in a
> > technical discussion so it got no replies. I'm starting over in
> order
> > to
> > reach a wider target f
Am 06.12.2009 21:22, schrieb Dan Winship:
> On 12/06/2009 10:05 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
>> I guess what I really would like is a way that I can use GLib privately
>> from my library and have it be thread-safe without requiring users of my
>> library have to link against gthread and call g_thread_init
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 14:22 -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
> On 12/06/2009 10:05 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
> > I guess what I really would like is a way that I can use GLib
> privately
> > from my library and have it be thread-safe without requiring users
> of my
> > library have to link against gthread and
On 12/06/2009 10:05 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
> I guess what I really would like is a way that I can use GLib privately
> from my library and have it be thread-safe without requiring users of my
> library have to link against gthread and call g_thread_init. I think it
> is primarily just GSlice that is
On 12/06/2009 03:16 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> This change only affects the case where the appliation uses gobject (and
> thus initializes it early). If g_type_init is not called then there is
> no difference wrt the current behaviour.
>
I see. This seems like a step in the right direction, b
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 19:45 -0500, Adam Goode wrote:
> > I'll start with the proposal and then explain the reasons for it:
> >
> > Starting with next glib release:
> > * libgobject links to libgthread
> > * g_type_init() starts with:
> >
> > #ifdef G_THREADS_ENABLED
> > if (g_thread_supported()
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 19:45 -0500, Adam Goode wrote:
> Specifically, I have a library that internally uses GSlice and
> GHashTable, but I don't expose any GLib details. I link my library with
> Java and other applications that use pthreads.
In the java-gnome library (the Java language bindings to
> I'll start with the proposal and then explain the reasons for it:
>
> Starting with next glib release:
> * libgobject links to libgthread
> * g_type_init() starts with:
>
> #ifdef G_THREADS_ENABLED
> if (g_thread_supported())
>g_thread_init (NULL);
> #endif
>
> This means that everything
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>
> This particular instance is fixed, but there can be a lot more out
> there. Why force every app to add this check when we could do it
> ourselves.
I'm not objecting to defaulting to working around this bug; it's
certainly possible other
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 18:01 +, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Alexander Larsson
> wrote:
> >
> > Running with this patch i ran into an issue while building
> gnome-shell:
> >
> > GENGdm-1.0.gir
> >
> > GThread-ERROR **: GThread system may only be initialized once.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>
> Running with this patch i ran into an issue while building gnome-shell:
>
> GEN Gdm-1.0.gir
>
> GThread-ERROR **: GThread system may only be initialized once.
> aborting...
> Command '['/gnome/src/gnome-shell/src/tmp-introspectpoWP_
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:07 +, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2009/12/2 Alexander Larsson :
> > On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:48 +, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> 2009/12/2 Alexander Larsson :
> >> > I'm certainly for this. Does anyone know of any system in use
> where
> >> > gthreads are not availib
2009/12/2 Alexander Larsson :
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:48 +, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2009/12/2 Alexander Larsson :
>> > I'm certainly for this. Does anyone know of any system in use where
>> > gthreads are not availible?
>>
>> One problem I've had in the past is writing mysql plugins.
>>
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:48 +, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2009/12/2 Alexander Larsson :
> > I'm certainly for this. Does anyone know of any system in use where
> > gthreads are not availible?
>
> One problem I've had in the past is writing mysql plugins.
>
> I help maintain an image processin
2009/12/2 Alexander Larsson :
> I'm certainly for this. Does anyone know of any system in use where
> gthreads are not availible?
One problem I've had in the past is writing mysql plugins.
I help maintain an image processing library, and one use of the
library was a mysql plugin that added query-
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:29 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:35 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > This was previously discussed here, but was sort of hidden in a
> > technical discussion so it got no replies. I'm starting over in
> order
> > to
> > reach a wider target f
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 16:16 -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
> On 12/01/2009 03:36 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > I don't think that is quite right. Its only safe to set this define
> if
> > you can guarantee there is no calls to your code before g_type_init
> (or
> > g_thread_init directly) is called.
On 12/01/2009 03:36 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> I don't think that is quite right. Its only safe to set this define if
> you can guarantee there is no calls to your code before g_type_init (or
> g_thread_init directly) is called.
Hrmph. Could potentially add a define which would cause a G_LIKEL
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09:26 -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
> On 12/01/2009 08:29 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > In addition to enabling threads (if complied in) in g_type_init() it
> > adds a G_THREADS_MANDATORY define that if set causes all the
> > g_thread_supported() calls to be removed in the g_th
On 12/01/2009 08:29 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> In addition to enabling threads (if complied in) in g_type_init() it
> adds a G_THREADS_MANDATORY define that if set causes all the
> g_thread_supported() calls to be removed in the g_thread_* macros.
Should probably add that to Cflags in gobject-
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:35 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> This was previously discussed here, but was sort of hidden in a
> technical discussion so it got no replies. I'm starting over in order
> to
> reach a wider target for the discussion.
>
> I'll start with the proposal and then explain th
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 18:27 +0100, Christian Dywan wrote:
> Am Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:35:36 +0100
> schrieb Alexander Larsson :
>
> > This was previously discussed here, but was sort of hidden in a
> > technical discussion so it got no replies. I'm starting over in
> order
> > to reach a wider target
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:35 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> Starting with next glib release:
> * libgobject links to libgthread
> * g_type_init() starts with:
>
> #ifdef G_THREADS_ENABLED
> if ([!]g_thread_supported())
>g_thread_init (NULL);
> #endif
>
> This means that everything above
Am Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:35:36 +0100
schrieb Alexander Larsson :
> This was previously discussed here, but was sort of hidden in a
> technical discussion so it got no replies. I'm starting over in order
> to reach a wider target for the discussion.
>
> I'll start with the proposal and then explain
Alexander Larsson redhat.com> writes:
> Starting with next glib release:
> * libgobject links to libgthread
> * g_type_init() starts with:
>
> #ifdef G_THREADS_ENABLED
> if (g_thread_supported())
>g_thread_init (NULL);
> #endif
>
Finally.
I'm so sick of the issues (mostly performance-rela
This was previously discussed here, but was sort of hidden in a
technical discussion so it got no replies. I'm starting over in order to
reach a wider target for the discussion.
I'll start with the proposal and then explain the reasons for it:
Starting with next glib release:
* libgobject links
26 matches
Mail list logo
