On Thu, 25 May 2006, Stefan Kost wrote:
Hi Tim,
thanks for the extensive comments and detailed concerns. Don't you think
it would be good to keep the buzzgilla issue open. Its an enhancement
request after all and there seems to be several people wanting to have
it.
well, my concern is that mo
Hi Tim,
thanks for the extensive comments and detailed concerns. Don't you think
it would be good to keep the buzzgilla issue open. Its an enhancement
request after all and there seems to be several people wanting to have
it. The bugzilla issue could serve as a tracker item. And now maybe some
mor
Hello Tim,
Nice to see someone finally addressing this matter.
the request for providing object and strcuture serialization/deserialization
in libgobject has come up a number of times:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2001-January/msg00128.html
http://mail.gnome.org/archives
Tim Janik wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> the request for providing object and strcuture
> serialization/deserialization
> in libgobject has come up a number of times:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2001-January/msg00128.html
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2004-October/m
I'll outline the implementation of a real-world generic GObject
serialization/deserialization system that we wrote from scratch to handle these
issues.
> a) the GType system is not self-contained enough to recursively (de-)serialize
> nested structures and objects (e.g. POINTER or BOXED type
Hi All.
the request for providing object and strcuture serialization/deserialization
in libgobject has come up a number of times:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2001-January/msg00128.html
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2004-October/msg00123.html
http://bugzilla
