Hi,
On Di, 2014-12-30 at 09:45 +, John Emmas wrote:
> I work on an audio product called Mixbus which uses gtk+ (albeit gtk2,
> rather than gtk3):-
>
> http://harrisonconsoles.com/site/mixbus.html
>
> I've been arguing for a year or more that we should phase out XP support
> - but the more
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:45:11 +, John Emmas wrote:
> Perhaps Microsoft itself should be the guiding factor? If Microsoft
> starts bringing out products which can't be run on XP, that might be the
> right time for gtk+ to start dropping it.
Office 2013 doesn't even run on Vista, let alone XP
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> I also make
> a totally uninformed 'gut' guess that the people who are still running
> XP are probably not the kind of people (by and large) who are into
> installing new versions of software on their computers anyway (ie: they
> won't be usin
hi Fan Chun-wei,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014, at 03:26, Fan Chun-wei wrote:
> -There are some things that required specialized implementations for XP,
> for example, SRWLock in GLib and networking items in GIO, which may or
> may not work well.
> (for example, by using inet_pton() directly in ginetad
On 30/12/14 08:30 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> there's also the aspect of other projects in the larger free and open
> source software ecosystem. what is Firefox doing? what is LibreOffice
> doing? what is Qt doing? are we the last holdout?
Firefox still supports Windows XP [1]. It still represent
On 30/12/14 13:30, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
I've been arguing for a year or more that we should phase out XP support
- but the more senior devs don't agree. Why? Because a surprising
number of our Windows users are still running XP (probably more than a
third). XP is still far more common than y
hi;
On 30 December 2014 at 12:48, Martyn Russell wrote:
>> I work on an audio product called Mixbus which uses gtk+ (albeit gtk2,
>> rather than gtk3):-
>>
>> http://harrisonconsoles.com/site/mixbus.html
we're definitely not dropping support in GTK 2.x; that branch is done,
for better or worse.
On 30/12/14 09:45, John Emmas wrote:
I work on an audio product called Mixbus which uses gtk+ (albeit gtk2,
rather than gtk3):-
http://harrisonconsoles.com/site/mixbus.html
I've been arguing for a year or more that we should phase out XP support
- but the more senior devs don't agree. Why? Be
I work on an audio product called Mixbus which uses gtk+ (albeit gtk2,
rather than gtk3):-
http://harrisonconsoles.com/site/mixbus.html
I've been arguing for a year or more that we should phase out XP support
- but the more senior devs don't agree. Why? Because a surprising
number of our Wi
+1 to drop it
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Fan Chun-wei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Happy Holidays and Happy New Year!
>
> I understand that this has been brought up before, but I think probably
> it's time to gather views on whether we should start to drop XP support, as:
>
> -There are some things th
Hi,
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year!
I understand that this has been brought up before, but I think probably
it's time to gather views on whether we should start to drop XP support, as:
-There are some things that required specialized implementations for XP,
for example, SRWLock in GLib an
11 matches
Mail list logo
