At Sat, 21 May 2011 03:37:38 +0200,
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:06:32PM +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am looking for comments from git experts on any of the operations
I'm doing and how feasible would be to rewrite the git.gnome.org
repository. The resulting repository
2011/5/24 Yasushi SHOJI ya...@atmark-techno.com:
At Sat, 21 May 2011 03:37:38 +0200,
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:06:32PM +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am looking for comments from git experts on any of the operations
I'm doing and how feasible would be to rewrite the
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:09:11AM +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
In any case, what worries me the most is bandwidth usage (though I
don't have any numbers), it seems weird to me that we are moving away
from tar.gz/bz2 to save bandwidth and still we waste so much bandwidth
cloning
On Tue 24 May 2011 13:33, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl writes:
If someone[1] says that they're pretty confident that it doesn't have any
drawbacks, then I can proceed.
There are drawbacks.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cairo/2006-May/006992.html
By trimming the repo you invalidate
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:06:32PM +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am looking for comments from git experts on any of the operations
I'm doing and how feasible would be to rewrite the git.gnome.org
repository. The resulting repository can be found in my github
site[0].
Any git experts who can
Hello everbody,
I have been playing around with trimming the gdk-pixbuf repository as
it carries all the changes from Gtk+ 2.x before it was split.
I have used the script attached, it basically figures out which files
have been removed and removes all the content related to them from the
history.
