On Do, 31.12.2009 14:43, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>Right, I'm not sure what you have intrerpreted by nesting commands,
>seems to me you mean, "including a group of commands as a command
>in a new group of commands", thats *not* what I had interpreted as
>"nested commands",
True. The notation in
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Particularly point 5, nested transactions; I banged my head around that one
> for a while and finally did not implement this; my interpretation of
> nested transactions
> was something like this:
> o User initiates action
> o action g
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Holger Berndt wrote:
> On Mi, 30.12.2009 21:32, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>
>>Particularly point 5, nested transactions; I banged my head around that one
>>for a while and finally did not implement this; my interpretation of
>>nested transactions
>>was something l
On Mi, 30.12.2009 21:32, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>Particularly point 5, nested transactions; I banged my head around that one
>for a while and finally did not implement this; my interpretation of
>nested transactions
>was something like this:
> o User initiates action
> o action goes and modif
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Holger Berndt wrote:
>> Cross-posting to move the discussion to gtk-devel-list. Anybody interested
>> in the topic, please follow up there.
>>
>> On Do, 24.09.2009 19:23, A. Walton wrote:
>>
>>>It's definitely
Hi Ross,
>I'll have a look at your code later when I'm not feeling really rough,
>but have you seen the undo classes in Marlin and Tasks?
No, in fact I hadn't. Interesting to see different implementations
popping up..
> koto-undo-action.c.
Providing suitable GtkAction's for undo and redo with t
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 18:02 +0100, Holger Berndt wrote:
> Cross-posting to move the discussion to gtk-devel-list. Anybody interested
> in the topic, please follow up there.
>
> On Do, 24.09.2009 19:23, A. Walton wrote:
>
> >It's definitely something many developers would love to see in Gtk+,
> >b
Hi Paul,
thanks for your remarks!
On Di, 29.12.2009 21:48, Paul Davis wrote:
>It was designed after looking at undo models in various other
>applications, and finding them all to have various problems for what
>we really needed (this included the GIMP).
This seems to be a common scenario. Let'
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Holger Berndt wrote:
> Cross-posting to move the discussion to gtk-devel-list. Anybody interested
> in the topic, please follow up there.
>
> On Do, 24.09.2009 19:23, A. Walton wrote:
>
>>It's definitely something many developers would love to see in Gtk+,
>>but o
Cross-posting to move the discussion to gtk-devel-list. Anybody interested
in the topic, please follow up there.
On Do, 24.09.2009 19:23, A. Walton wrote:
>It's definitely something many developers would love to see in Gtk+,
>but only a few have stepped up to the bat with patches and actually
>di
10 matches
Mail list logo