Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-15 Thread Owen Taylor
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 23:00 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote: > > Try: > > > > if $have_base_x_pc ; then > > GDK_EXTRA_LIBS="$x_extra_libs" > > else > > -GDK_EXTRA_LIBS="$X_LIBS $x_extra_libs -lX11 $GDK_EXTRA_LIBS" > > +GDK_EXTRA_LIBS="$X_LIBS $x_extra_libs -lXext $GDK_EXTRA_LIBS" > > fi

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-15 Thread Jonas Bonn
> Try: > > if $have_base_x_pc ; then > GDK_EXTRA_LIBS="$x_extra_libs" > else > -GDK_EXTRA_LIBS="$X_LIBS $x_extra_libs -lX11 $GDK_EXTRA_LIBS" > +GDK_EXTRA_LIBS="$X_LIBS $x_extra_libs -lXext $GDK_EXTRA_LIBS" > fi That did the trick. With this modification, the build passes. Thank

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-15 Thread Owen Taylor
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 22:46 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote: > No, that doesn't fix the problem. I changed have_base_pc to > have_base_x_pc as you said, but I get the same error as I had before. > I build using jhbuild, and the error output is as follows, for what > it's worth: > > gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o .

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-15 Thread Jonas Bonn
No, that doesn't fix the problem. I changed have_base_pc to have_base_x_pc as you said, but I get the same error as I had before. I build using jhbuild, and the error output is as follows, for what it's worth: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/gtk-query-immodules-2.0 queryimmodules.o ./.libs/libg tk-x1

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-15 Thread Owen Taylor
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 07:33 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. I missed this post and was wondering if > someone had intentionally changed something... I think this is what > has broken the CVS build on my machine. > > I had to modify the Makefile in the 'gdk' directory by addin

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-14 Thread Glynn Foster
Hey, I'm also seeing this, or something like this FWIW - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313503 Glynn On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 07:33 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. I missed this post and was wondering if > someone had intentionally changed something... I think thi

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-14 Thread Jonas Bonn
Sorry for the late reply. I missed this post and was wondering if someone had intentionally changed something... I think this is what has broken the CVS build on my machine. I had to modify the Makefile in the 'gdk' directory by adding "-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXext" to the defintion of GDK_DEP_LIBS in

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-10 Thread J. Ali Harlow
On 10/08/05 12:43:51, Owen Taylor wrote: The first is probably simpler - go back to: if test "x$gdktarget" = "xwin32"; then PANGO_PACKAGES="pangowin32 pangocairo" else PANGO_PACKAGES="pango pangocairo" fi Works for me - committed. Thanks, Owen. -- Ali Harlow

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-10 Thread J. Ali Harlow
On 10/08/05 12:43:51, Owen Taylor wrote: The first is probably simpler - go back to: if test "x$gdktarget" = "xwin32"; then PANGO_PACKAGES="pangowin32 pangocairo" else PANGO_PACKAGES="pango pangocairo" fi Since pangocairo pulls in pangowin32 on Windows, there is no added in

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-10 Thread Owen Taylor
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 11:06 +, J. Ali Harlow wrote: > On 10/08/05 04:03:29, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > So, if people want to test out what is in CVS now I'd appreciate it, > > especially for those deviating from the central stream of > > Linux+recent X.org. > > The changes to configure.in seem

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-10 Thread J. Ali Harlow
On 10/08/05 04:03:29, Owen Taylor wrote: So, if people want to test out what is in CVS now I'd appreciate it, especially for those deviating from the central stream of Linux+recent X.org. The changes to configure.in seem fine, but the changes to gdkfont- win32.c that were checked in at the s

Re: configure.in changes

2005-08-09 Thread James Henstridge
Owen Taylor wrote: >So, if people want to test out what is in CVS now I'd appreciate it, >especially for those deviating from the central stream of >Linux+recent X.org. > > I hit a compile problem, and committed the attached patch to fix it. If $X_PACKAGES contained any pkg-config package nam

configure.in changes

2005-08-09 Thread Owen Taylor
I just rewrote large chunks of the X checks in configure.in ... there were a couple of points of this: - Remove the entanglements with pangoxft, which I've removed as a dependency of GTK+. - Use pkg-config as much as possible rather than older heuristics. With X11R7 .pc files for the X li