Re: fdwalk

2018-03-08 Thread Philip Withnall
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 13:15 +, Markus Teich via gtk-devel-list wrote: > Heyho, > > I discovered you have a fdwalk implementation in glib/gspawn.c which > is not exported as a usable symbol. Is there any reason for this? If > not, I'd suggest exporting that symbol an

fdwalk

2018-03-06 Thread Markus Teich via gtk-devel-list
Heyho, I discovered you have a fdwalk implementation in glib/gspawn.c which is not exported as a usable symbol. Is there any reason for this? If not, I'd suggest exporting that symbol and maybe even another wrapper that takes a list of FDs to keep open instead of the callback pointer and c

Re: fdwalk

2018-01-29 Thread Philip Withnall
Hey, The general answer to this kind of question is ’because nobody has needed it’. If you can demonstrate a need for a public fdwalk() implementation, which would be used by multiple apps, for a purpose which can’t just be served by GSubprocess or g_spawn_*(), then please file a bug about it on

Re: fdwalk

2018-01-29 Thread Markus Teich via gtk-devel-list
Heyho, I'm going to unsubscribe from the list now to avoid noise. If someone gets interested in this, please CC me in any response. Thanks! --Markus On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:46 PM Markus Teich < mteich+gtk-devel-l...@google.com> wrote: > Heyho, > > I discover

fdwalk

2018-01-15 Thread Markus Teich via gtk-devel-list
Heyho, I discovered you have a fdwalk implementation in glib/gspawn.c which is not exported as a usable symbol. Is there any reason for this? If not, I'd suggest exporting that symbol and maybe even another wrapper that takes a list of FDs to keep open instead of the callback pointer and c