Hi;
Am Wed, 12 May 2010 13:22:34 -0400
schrieb David Zeuthen zeut...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Christian Persch c...@gnome.org
- g_bus_own_name has a _on_connection variant that directly takes a
GDBusConnection*; maybe g_bus_watch_name and g_bus_watch_proxy
shoule also
Hey,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Christian Persch c...@gnome.org wrote:
Sure, if it turns out we need such variants we can always add them
I actually used g_bus_watch_name() in a situation where I already
had a GDBusConnection* available, so being able to pass it directly
instead of by
Hi;
I have just a few remarks/questions after having ported a couple of
things to gdbus, and having looked at the API:
- g_bus_own_name has a _on_connection variant that directly takes a
GDBusConnection*; maybe g_bus_watch_name and g_bus_watch_proxy
shoule also have such a variant.
-
Hey,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Christian Persch c...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi;
I have just a few remarks/questions after having ported a couple of
things to gdbus, and having looked at the API:
Cool, thanks for doing this!
- g_bus_own_name has a _on_connection variant that directly takes
On Thu, 6 May 2010 14:06:40 -0400, Matthias Clasen
Hey,
I thought I should let everybody know that we are getting very close
to merging gdbus into GLib. David has created a gdbus-merge branch
where we'll stage things before the final merge to master. So, if you
haven't payed attention to
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
Problem on my side (the header include seems correctly protected and
all, although of course I'm on Linux... so not sure what's going on)
or something wrong in
