Am Donnerstag, den 04.10.2007, 09:06 +0200 schrieb Mikael Hallendal:
> That would indeed be very welcome. I also have one a SHA algorithm in
> Loudmouth that would be nice to get rid of.
So let's finally get this in:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443648
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Has
4 okt 2007 kl. 01.51 skrev Fernando Herrera:
> On 10/4/07, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [1] well, there's a bug open[2] with a patch, providing a generic
>> (MD5,
>> SHA1 and SHA256) checksum API; I'd like a review of it so that it
>> can go
>> in GLib 2.16, now that Tim br
On 10/4/07, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] well, there's a bug open[2] with a patch, providing a generic (MD5,
> SHA1 and SHA256) checksum API; I'd like a review of it so that it can go
> in GLib 2.16, now that Tim branched it.
Yes please! Last time I checked there was 18 differ