On Monday, 28 October 2013, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> The OpenEmbedded people are looking at it this cycle I believe.
>
Indeed we are. Currently only glib is installing tests but integrating
them with our "ptest" framework for installing/running test suites is
trivial so more will follow.
Ross
__
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 16:34 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Absolutely. I think your work in CI / installed-tests / OSTree is great, and
> I'd
> love to do some of that in Debian. We are starting to package installed tests,
> which would make it easier to do CI with jenkins or similar. But
Hi,
As we look further into making GLib (and most probably the GTK+/Clutter
stack) work better on Windows, here are some of my further thoughts
about it:
As neither of the MSVC-based build approaches (the Visual Studio
Projects nor Han's NMake Makefiles) support building the unit tests, I
a
which would make it easier to do CI with jenkins or similar. But I haven't had
the time to look into this or think about it much.
I pointed out the Debian builds with `make check' executions because this thread
was specifically about non-Linux OSes and non-standard compilers (and I extended
Hey,
2013/10/21 Ryan Lortie :
>
> We have brainstormed a list of platforms that we think that we want to
> support and it looks like so: Linux, {Free,Net,Open}BSD,
> (Open?)Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, Hurd, Darwin, mingw(32/64), MSVC.
>[...]
> What would be nice is if we could gain access to some machin
When I read this again I realized my previous mail had a bad tone...what
I really wanted to say is:
I think InstalledTests is a natural evolution of "make check" that is
far more powerful and flexible, and I'd really love to see Debian and
other projects making use of it.
Specifically in helping
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013, at 6:26, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> It would be nice if we can keep XP compatibility for a few more years
> (why would we need to drop it now?). XP support could be limited to
> mingw64, if it's complicated to keep MSVC support?
The biggest gain here would be to kill the beas
On 23/10/13 11:26, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> It would be nice if we can keep XP compatibility for a few more years
> (why would we need to drop it now?).
"Because it lacks APIs that would have been helpful" is the usual
reason? You have to draw a line somewhere and say "we aren't going to
bother
Hi
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, wrote:
> Also, just wondering whether there are any people using GLib with Windows XP
> 64-bit edition or Windows Server 2003 x64, or does GLib (built as x64
> binaries) even work on these platforms? The thing is, if there isn't really
I have been successful
On 10/22/2013 11:45 AM, fanc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote:
> Unforunately I
> can't say anything about anything at or before Visual Studio 2005, as I
> don't have access to them
Since you are (as far as I can remember) the only person who has
submitted any Visual Studio build fixes in the last several ye
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 10:07 -0400, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> (Note that sometimes test failures are
> just race conditions because the tests run on loaded/slow machines).
Over time I've been trying to fix these race conditions, because unlike
Debian's package builds, gnome-continuous runs th
Hello,
I think the above list is a good start. But it is not good enough. We
also need to specify which versions of the above OSes, and which
versions of the compilers (especially important for e.g. msvc).
For MSVC I agree. For the others, I don't think it's that big of a
problem (although it
Hi,
On 21/10/13 10:34, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> hi,
>
> GLib aims to work on a wide range of operating systems, but we have no
> good story for ensuring that this is the case. Mostly we do things for
> Linux and, if they are the sort of thing that may cause problems, we
> also check that they work o
hi
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013, at 6:11, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> By Darwin you mean OSX in general I assume?
yes. I guess we need Cocoa here too in order to really be useful.
> I think the above list is a good start. But it is not good enough. We
> also need to specify which versions of the above O
On mån, 2013-10-21 at 10:34 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> hi,
>
> GLib aims to work on a wide range of operating systems, but we have no
> good story for ensuring that this is the case. Mostly we do things for
> Linux and, if they are the sort of thing that may cause problems, we
> also check that
hi,
GLib aims to work on a wide range of operating systems, but we have no
good story for ensuring that this is the case. Mostly we do things for
Linux and, if they are the sort of thing that may cause problems, we
also check that they work on Windows. We read manpages and make sure
that the fun
16 matches
Mail list logo
