Re: set_resize

2009-01-15 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno mer, 14/01/2009 alle 23.00 +0200, Markku Vire ha scritto: Hi, 0On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 17:00 +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote: Forcibly clipping window size would anyway only be band-aid to the real problem in the application, which can be: ... - it doesn't constrain the

Re: set_resize

2009-01-15 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno gio, 15/01/2009 alle 08.55 +0200, Kalle Vahlman ha scritto: So while setting sensible minimum sizes and constraining maximum by ellipsation or scrolled container for your *widgets* makes totally sense (to ensure the application will be usable on the first run), taking over the window

Re: set_resize

2009-01-15 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, 2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston too...@email.it: the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says: Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a widget will actually be allocated. While there may be a lot of reasons why a widget doesn't get the area requested, I

Re: set_resize

2009-01-15 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno gio, 15/01/2009 alle 16.41 -0500, Havoc Pennington ha scritto: Hi, On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Pietro Battiston too...@email.it wrote: I already considered my doubt as answered (see below), but I disagree with what you say: if you call size_request minimum size, why don't

set_resize

2009-01-14 Thread Pietro Battiston
Hello, the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says: Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a widget will actually be allocated. While there may be a lot of reasons why a widget doesn't get the area requested, I imagine(d) the basic one would be because there

Re: set_resize

2009-01-14 Thread markku . vire
Hi, Quoting Pietro Battiston too...@email.it: the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says: Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a widget will actually be allocated. While there may be a lot of reasons why a widget doesn't get the area requested, I

Re: set_resize

2009-01-14 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno mer, 14/01/2009 alle 15.19 +0200, markku.v...@iki.fi ha scritto: Hi, Quoting Pietro Battiston too...@email.it: the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says: Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a widget will actually be allocated.

Re: set_resize

2009-01-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston too...@email.it: Hello, the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says: Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a widget will actually be allocated. While there may be a lot of reasons why a widget doesn't get the area requested, I

Re: set_resize

2009-01-14 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno mer, 14/01/2009 alle 17.20 +0200, Kalle Vahlman ha scritto: 2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston too...@email.it: I would have filed a bug (asking for windows to clip to screen when their their size_request is too big*), but it's obviously a major issue, so obviously it can't be true that

Re: set_resize

2009-01-14 Thread Markku Vire
Hi, 0On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 17:00 +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote: Forcibly clipping window size would anyway only be band-aid to the real problem in the application, which can be: ... - it doesn't constrain the size of a dynamically resizing widget I don't see how this is a problem;

Re: set_resize

2009-01-14 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston too...@email.it: Il giorno mer, 14/01/2009 alle 17.20 +0200, Kalle Vahlman ha scritto: 2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston too...@email.it: I would have filed a bug (asking for windows to clip to screen when their their size_request is too big*), but it's obviously a major