[snip]
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 22:14 +0200, Dieter Verfaillie wrote:
> That leaves just a folder, which is exactly what the bundle is
> and always has been (for example:
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/gtk+/2.24/)
>
> An SDK, in my mind, adds all the tools, sources, patches, scripts
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:46:59 +0200, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
I see ffi.h and ffitarget.h in lib\libffi-3.0.10\include\ but e.g.
glib expects those in include\ instead.
lib/pkgconfig/libffi.pc claims
"includedir=${libdir}/libffi-3.0.11/include"
and afaik when building glib pkgconfig is used
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
wrote:
> On 17/07/2012 16:43, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
>> wrote:
>>> Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
>>> I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projec
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 09:20 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> Is anyone any closer to having a Windows installer for GTK+ 3 ready?
>
You might want to check out
http://blogs.gnome.org/xjuan/2012/05/29/cross-compiling-glade-for-win32/
There is a fedora project that cross compile Gtk and lots of othe
On 17/07/2012 14:23, John Stowers wrote:
Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projects/gnome-windows/GTK+3/
from time to time... For now at least, once stable it'll go to
ftp.gnome.org :)
aside #1:
Did you/anyone check out
On 17/07/2012 13:14, Damon Register wrote:
On 7/16/2012 3:25 PM, Dieter Verfaillie wrote:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
Thanks. I downloaded last night. I hope you don't mind me asking
but I guess I don't totally understand what I read at the site.
Is this a
On 17/07/2012 16:43, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
> wrote:
>> Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
>> I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projects/gnome-windows/GTK+3/
>> from time to time... For now at least,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:14:08 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I just want the built libraries and bits, ideally put in the right
>> place automatically. I don't have the time or enthusiasm to build
>> everything on Windows myself.
>
> Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
> I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projects/gnome-windows/GTK+3/
> from time to time... For now at least, once stable it'll go to
> ftp.gnome.org :)
aside #1:
Did you/anyone check out the jhbuild-like build system the
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:14:08 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Yes, I just want the built libraries and bits, ideally put in the
right
place automatically. I don't have the time or enthusiasm to build
everything on Windows myself. I can just about bear to build my
application on Windows if GTK+ is av
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:30:11 +0200, John Stowers wrote:
There's a couple of patches you need that are not yet upstreamed
(due to their "ugly hack"/"wip" status) in this branch:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
But then I saw
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/win
On 7/16/2012 3:25 PM, Dieter Verfaillie wrote:
There's a couple of patches you need that are not yet upstreamed
(due to their "ugly hack"/"wip" status) in this branch:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
Thanks. I downloaded last night. I hope you don't mind me ask
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 21:25 +0200, Dieter Verfaillie wrote:
> Installers are for end user product (GIMP, Gedit, Inkscape, etc)
> but not for libraries and components used to build such end user
> products. An installer for some sort of an SDK however would a
> different matter...
Yes, I just want
>
> There's a couple of patches you need that are not yet upstreamed
> (due to their "ugly hack"/"wip" status) in this branch:
> https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
But then I saw
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/windows-devel-list/2012-July/msg0.html
Which confus
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:55:51 -0400, Damon Register wrote:
On 7/13/2012 3:21 AM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro wrote:
There is some beta one that you can ask to dieter.
That takes all the fun out of trying to build it from source :-)
For the last few weeks I have been experimenting with trying to buil
On 7/13/2012 3:21 AM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro wrote:
There is some beta one that you can ask to dieter.
That takes all the fun out of trying to build it from source :-)
For the last few weeks I have been experimenting with trying to build
using Mingw and have made some progress but an stuck on g
There is some beta one that you can ask to dieter.
Regards.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
> Is anyone any closer to having a Windows installer for GTK+ 3 ready?
>
> --
> Murray Cumming
> murr...@murrayc.com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
>
> _
Is anyone any closer to having a Windows installer for GTK+ 3 ready?
--
Murray Cumming
murr...@murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
18 matches
Mail list logo
