It's been some time since I rebuilt my docs with gtk-doc and I wanted to comment
about this weird behavior I am seeing with 1.17 and cross refs. To summarize;
My project, like many gtk-doc projects, has libraries in the tree which contain
references to each other. An ordinary layout, much like t
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:29:13PM -0400, Philip Kovacs wrote:
> project
> -+liba
> -+libb
> -+docs
> --+reference
> ---+liba
> ---+libb
>
>
> Now, liba contains no doc references into libb, but libb contains some
> references
> to liba. When I build the project, as follows:
>
> ./autogen.sh
* David Nečas [2011-09-14 21:39:04 +0200]:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:29:13PM -0400, Philip Kovacs wrote:
> > project
> > -+liba
> > -+libb
> > -+docs
> > --+reference
> > ---+liba
> > ---+libb
> >
> >
> > Now, liba contains no doc references into libb, but libb contains some
> > references
Am 14.09.2011 22:23, schrieb Philip Kovacs:
* David Nečas [2011-09-14 21:39:04 +0200]:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:29:13PM -0400, Philip Kovacs wrote:
project
-+liba
-+libb
-+docs
--+reference
---+liba
---+libb
Now, liba contains no doc references into libb, but libb contains some
reference
* Stefan Kost [2011-09-14 22:46:10 +0200]:
> Am 14.09.2011 22:23, schrieb Philip Kovacs:
> > * David Nečas [2011-09-14 21:39:04 +0200]:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:29:13PM -0400, Philip Kovacs wrote:
> >>> project
> >>> -+liba
> >>> -+libb
> >>> -+docs
> >>> --+reference
> >>> ---+liba
>
I observe that the process to build fully linked documentation from a pristine
source tree (dist|maintainer clean) is two-pass when there are subtrees that
have cross references to each other. This is understandable, as there must be
html files in the subtrees in order to fix the cross referen
Hi Phil,
On 09/14/11 23:36, Philip Kovacs wrote:
> I observe that the process to build fully linked documentation from a
> pristine
> source tree (dist|maintainer clean) is two-pass when there are subtrees that
> have cross references to each other. This is understandable, as there must
> be
