Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] [PATCH] Final Bitzi Patch

2004-09-30 Thread Christian Biere
alex wrote: > replaced strtof with atof which actually works Well, in this case it doesn't really matter because the value isn't used by anything but only shown. In general, people should never use atof(), atoi(), atol() because they don't provide any way to indicate failure. atof() is even badly

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] [PATCH] Final Bitzi Patch

2004-09-30 Thread alex
Hi, I think I've covered all the points raised previously. The final patch for integration is now on SF: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=1037927&group_id=4467&atid=304467 Changes: corrected indentation (including doc patch) replaced strtof with atof which actually work