Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] malloc problem [was: Null access in atoms.c]

2005-02-16 Thread Christian Biere
Bill Pringlemeir wrote: > I am having many crashes with GTKG configured for GTK2. The crashes > are generally the result of clearing a search (passive) with many > entries (300+, often 1000). That's probably the most useful hint. I don't use passive searches, so there might be something broken I

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] malloc problem [was: Null access in atoms.c]

2005-02-16 Thread Bill Pringlemeir
Bill Pringlemeir wrote: >>> Could this be an actual stack overflow? The traces >>> always look different. On 11 Feb 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Possibly, yes. You could try GCC SSP: >> http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/ Bill Pringlemeir wrote: > I have already ins

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] [Fwd: Bug Report]

2005-02-16 Thread jonas
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 20:45, Bernhard Duebi wrote: > Is this usefull ? [snip] > 05/02/16 15:01:47 (WARNING): [PARQ UL] punishing 80.145.105.48:33884 > (BearShare 4.3.4.2 (Deutsch)) for re-requesting > "Maximum_Perversum-Junge_Fotzen_hart_gedehnt.avi" 1032 secs early ^^^

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] [Fwd: Bug Report]

2005-02-16 Thread Bernhard Duebi
Is this usefull ? Cheers Bernhard --- Begin Message --- 05/02/16 06:05:14 (WARNING): This is an unofficial build which accesses files in this directory: "/data/Gnutella/gtk-gnutella-current" 05/02/16 06:05:14 (MESSAGE): using charset "ISO-8859-1" 05/02/16 06:05:14 (MESSAGE): gtk-gnutella/0.96u (