Matthew Lye wrote:
> I hadn't seen this before. I think that I'm looking at a failure to
> check a malloc'd pointer for NULL; am I correct?
NULL? Yes. malloc? No.
> The circumstance was, that I had selected many contiguous 'incomplete'
> download entries, and then re-sorted the list by clic
I hadn't seen this before. I think that I'm looking at a failure to
check a malloc'd pointer for NULL; am I correct?
The circumstance was, that I had selected many contiguous 'incomplete'
download entries, and then re-sorted the list by clicking on the top
of the 'progress' column.
> Progr
