On 1-Jul-08, at 1:18 PM, Christian Biere wrote:
> Matthew Lye wrote:
>> I've been 'implementing' browsing of proxied hosts via command line/
>> search field[1].
>> The menu interface uses data from the original selected item to name
>> the search entry after that address.
>> It seems impossible t
xiando wrote:
> > The world is getting more deep packet inspection happy. The obvious
> > next step is more routine use of encryption. I notice GTKG links
> > against TLS already. Will it use encryption for all connections?
> A relevant article: "'Yes' to surveillance law",
> http://www.thelocal.
Matthew Lye wrote:
> I've been 'implementing' browsing of proxied hosts via command line/
> search field[1].
> The menu interface uses data from the original selected item to name
> the search entry after that address.
> It seems impossible to derive the local address from the GUID of the
> ho
I've been 'implementing' browsing of proxied hosts via command line/
search field[1].
The menu interface uses data from the original selected item to name
the search entry after that address.
It seems impossible to derive the local address from the GUID of the
host.
(a) Is guid_oob_get_
Alex wrote:
> > A magnet provides information about a file including optionally one
> > or more URLs.
> Ahh, the wikipedia article let me down in summary. Are we talking
> about the "mt" tag here? The spec I can see is quite old (v0.1 2002)
> and doesn't give many examples.
No, the "mt" key isn'
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:36:38AM +0200, Christian Biere wrote:
> Alex wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 02:25:27AM +0200, Christian Biere wrote:
> > > Alex wrote:
> > We could default to TLS and only fall back if that fails (maybe gated
> > by config switch?).
>
> Yes, that could be done.
Cool
Alex wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 02:25:27AM +0200, Christian Biere wrote:
> > Alex wrote:
> > > The world is getting more deep packet inspection happy. The obvious
> > > next step is more routine use of encryption. I notice GTKG links
> > > against TLS already. Will it use encryption for all c
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 02:25:27AM +0200, Christian Biere wrote:
> Alex wrote:
> > The world is getting more deep packet inspection happy. The obvious
> > next step is more routine use of encryption. I notice GTKG links
> > against TLS already. Will it use encryption for all connections?
>
> You c
