Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Limiting vendor mono-culture.

2006-07-30 Thread Christian Biere
Bill Pringlemeir wrote: > However, I do notice a distinct preference to either Limewire or > Bearshare ultras. It seems to depend on build/host cache, with either > vendor becoming dominant. > It might be that they are only recommending hosts from the same vendor? I think that's indeed the case.

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Limiting vendor mono-culture.

2006-07-30 Thread Christian Biere
Alex Bennee wrote: > I've got my GnutellaNet settings to limit connections of 25% to anyone > vendor (and reserve 50% for GTKG nodes). This will just waste a lot of traffic due to the overhead of handshakes. There really aren't many Gtk-Gnutella peers especially not Ultrapeers. > However I always

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Limiting vendor mono-culture.

2006-07-30 Thread Bill Pringlemeir
On 30 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've got my GnutellaNet settings to limit connections of 25% to > anyone vendor (and reserve 50% for GTKG nodes). However I always > seem to end up with all Limewire connections (in bold). > > Is this because satellite nodes (the greyed out ones) count to

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Limiting vendor mono-culture.

2006-07-30 Thread Alex Bennee
I've got my GnutellaNet settings to limit connections of 25% to anyone vendor (and reserve 50% for GTKG nodes). However I always seem to end up with all Limewire connections (in bold). Is this because satellite nodes (the greyed out ones) count towards the totals? I don't seem to be seeing any oth