Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-05 Thread Christian Biere
Hans de Graaff wrote: > I have collected the ChangeLog for this release and included it below > (also in CVS). Did I miss anything for this list? Most changes were actually to address compiler warnings and recently to make the sources ANSI C compliant (using GCC with -W -Wall -Wformat=2 -ansi -pe

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-05 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 23:36 +0200, Christian Biere wrote: > The Unicode stuff is almost finished. The Configure options regarding > ICU should be removed so that everyone uses the same code. The code > itself should stay for testing purposes though. These tests are > currently broken because the l

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-05 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 22:41 +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote: > It looks like I will have time to create a new gtkg release at the end > of this week, probably on Friday, May 6th. I have collected the ChangeLog for this release and included it below (also in CVS). Did I miss anything for this list?

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-04 Thread Christian Biere
Christian Biere wrote: > I also think that filenames Gtk-Gnutella generates should be enforced > to UTF-8 NFC - except for Darwin which needs NFD. This is now the case. I've updated the CVS snapshot as well. -- Christian pgpUNmcvrAKNc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-02 Thread jonas
On Monday 02 May 2005 23:59, Christian Biere wrote: > Yes, that was caused by sending bad packets. It's been fixed some hours > later. Looks very promising after update. Hooray for release! -- br j. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-02 Thread Alex Bennee
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 23:36 +0200, Christian Biere wrote: > Hans de Graaff wrote: > > As far as I know there are no pending blocking bugs at the moment. I am > > not sure about the status of Bitzi tickets (Alex?) > > The Bitzi stuff should be fine. A minor issue is that they're not > enforced to e

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-02 Thread Christian Biere
jonas wrote: > for what it's worth: the snapshot of a few days ago has trouble maintaining > connections to LIME and BS UPs for longer than ~10 minutes on my machine. Yes, that was caused by sending bad packets. It's been fixed some hours later. -- Christian pgpkwsrtNUCPo.pgp Description: PGP

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-02 Thread jonas
Hi guys, On Monday 02 May 2005 22:41, Hans de Graaff wrote: > As far as I know there are no pending blocking bugs at the moment. for what it's worth: the snapshot of a few days ago has trouble maintaining connections to LIME and BS UPs for longer than ~10 minutes on my machine. (FreeBSD 4.11-p4

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-02 Thread Christian Biere
Hans de Graaff wrote: > As far as I know there are no pending blocking bugs at the moment. I am > not sure about the status of Bitzi tickets (Alex?) The Bitzi stuff should be fine. A minor issue is that they're not enforced to expire after some reasonable maximum time, so in theory you could end u

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Release proposal

2005-05-02 Thread Hans de Graaff
Hi, It looks like I will have time to create a new gtkg release at the end of this week, probably on Friday, May 6th. As far as I know there are no pending blocking bugs at the moment. I am not sure about the status of Bitzi tickets (Alex?) and I am also not sure where we stand on UTF-8 changes