Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-14 Thread Matthew Lye
On 13-May-09, at 3:15 PM, Christian Biere wrote: > Matthew Lye wrote: >> On 13-May-09, at 1:46 AM, Christian Biere wrote: >>> Do you get this warning for every incoming connection or just for >>> some? > >> Just for some, albeit fairly frequently. (That said, it's happening >> with every call to

Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-13 Thread Christian Biere
Matthew Lye wrote: > On 13-May-09, at 1:46 AM, Christian Biere wrote: > > Do you get this warning for every incoming connection or just for > > some? > Just for some, albeit fairly frequently. (That said, it's happening > with every call to getpeername$UNIX2003.) You could call getpeername(

Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-13 Thread Christian Biere
Matthew Lye wrote: > On 13-May-09, at 1:46 AM, Christian Biere wrote: > > Do you get this warning for every incoming connection or just for > > some? > Just for some, albeit fairly frequently. (That said, it's happening > with every call to getpeername$UNIX2003.) I'd have treated it as more

Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-13 Thread Matthew Lye
On 13-May-09, at 1:46 AM, Christian Biere wrote: > Do you get this warning for every incoming connection or just for > some? Just for some, albeit fairly frequently. (That said, it's happening with every call to getpeername$UNIX2003.) I'd have treated it as more of a problem if it was flo

Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-12 Thread Christian Biere
Matthew Lye wrote: > For a long time I've seen the following warning produced many, many > times per session: > > > 09-05-12 22:01:00 (WARNING): getpeername() failed: Invalid argument > > I just got around to checking into it with dtrace, and it appears that > getpeername() is not actually be

Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-12 Thread Christian Biere
Matthew Lye wrote: > On 12-May-09, at 11:26 PM, Christian Biere wrote: > > If that's the case you should see the relevant warnings on stderr. > > You can also try to remove the lines to verify your thesis. > > No, no, that would have been clever. > > It's more complicated than I thought. There's

Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-12 Thread Matthew Lye
On 12-May-09, at 11:26 PM, Christian Biere wrote: > If that's the case you should see the relevant warnings on stderr. > You can also try to remove the lines to verify your thesis. No, no, that would have been clever. It's more complicated than I thought. There's a "getpeername $UNIX2003()", whi

Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-12 Thread Christian Biere
Christian Biere wrote: > Matthew Lye wrote: > > For a long time I've seen the following warning produced many, many > > times per session: > > > > > 09-05-12 22:01:00 (WARNING): getpeername() failed: Invalid argument > > > > I just got around to checking into it with dtrace, and it appears that

Re: [gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-12 Thread Christian Biere
Matthew Lye wrote: > For a long time I've seen the following warning produced many, many > times per session: > > > 09-05-12 22:01:00 (WARNING): getpeername() failed: Invalid argument > > I just got around to checking into it with dtrace, and it appears that > getpeername() is not actually be

[gtk-gnutella-devel] getpeername() failed warning: getpeername not being called.

2009-05-12 Thread Matthew Lye
This may be old news. For a long time I've seen the following warning produced many, many times per session: > 09-05-12 22:01:00 (WARNING): getpeername() failed: Invalid argument I just got around to checking into it with dtrace, and it appears that getpeername() is not actually being called