Hi all,
Just wanted to tell you that the Unicode Consortium released CLDR 1.7
last week (full announcement below). GNOME is a member of the Unicode
Consortium, and we plan to use more of CLDR data in GNOME and vice
versa.
I am working with Behdad (GNOME's other representative to the Unicode
Conso
Unicode just released CLDR 1.6. This is the first time GNOME is
mentioned as a contributor. (Behdad, any news from the press release?
;-)
On another note, implementing CLDR in GNOME still needs huge resources and time.
Roozbeh
--
Unicode Releases Common Locale Data Reposi
I just opened a glib bug for supporting alternative calendars as some
(re?)starting point for locale project (aka giulia):
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344005
I have attached a ".h" file to the bug for discussion, and I am also
planning to extend GtkCalendar to handle non-Gregorian c
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 11:34 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:53:44 +0800
> Zhe Su <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMO, it's unfair.
>
> Excuse me, am I accused as unfair?
>
> PRC (or anybody else) had proposed precomposed Tibetan glyphs
> to Unicode official inclusion? I c
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 04:35 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> But hey, check first with
> the Arab community. I'm not quite sure that using those digits
> is actually preferred at all.
Well, it *is* preferred in Saudi Arabia, as far as I know. Also in a few
other countries, but the exact list is co
Screenshots?
roozbeh
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:10 -0500, Boncek, John wrote:
> I have an application with internationalized text display working well,
> mostly, using GTK 2.2.4, pango 1.2.5, and UTF-8. It runs under MontaVista
> Linux and uses gdk_draw_layout to draw all text. However, I have a
