Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau
> You can't link a proprietary app to Qt under the GPL or the QPL. You > have to buy a license that allows use with a proprietary app. Both QPL > and GPL are "viral." That is true. I was confused. W. ___ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:

Re: System colors under GTK

2001-04-27 Thread Havoc Pennington
Esteban Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a way to use "system colors" (colors customized by users) under > GTK? > I'd like, for example, to create a control that will use the default > window color, the one > the user can config under linuxconf or something. > Just use th

Re: Which tree widget should I use?

2001-04-27 Thread Havoc Pennington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > For an application I'm planning to write I need to use a tree widget. > But I'm not shure which one to choose, because I'm not very experienced with > GTK. > So could please someone summarize which advantages/disadvantages the two > tree widgets of GTK 1 have, and f

Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Havoc Pennington
Wolfgang Sourdeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Havoc" == Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > GTK is what we would recommend on this list. ;-) Both are certainly > > reasonable. Qt requires a license fee if your software is > > proprietary. GTK uses C and Qt C++. > > This

System colors under GTK

2001-04-27 Thread Esteban Quijano Vincenzi
Is there a way to use "system colors" (colors customized by users) under GTK? I'd like, for example, to create a control that will use the default window color, the one the user can config under linuxconf or something. Esteban Q. ___ gtk-list mailing

Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Daniel Elstner
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:29:20 -0400 Wolfgang Sourdeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Havoc" == Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > GTK is what we would recommend on this list. ;-) Both are certainly > > reasonable. Qt requires a license fee if your software is > > proprietary.

Which tree widget should I use?

2001-04-27 Thread mail
Hello. For an application I'm planning to write I need to use a tree widget. But I'm not shure which one to choose, because I'm not very experienced with GTK. So could please someone summarize which advantages/disadvantages the two tree widgets of GTK 1 have, and for what kinds of uses they are m

Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Timothy M. Shead
Havoc Pennington wrote: > Ed Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I know that there are other GIU development tools out there, like Qt. >> Is GTK+ the best place for me to be starting? I know, I'm asking to >> start a flame war, and this is not my desire. I really don't know, and >> wa

Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Wolfgang Sourdeau
> "Havoc" == Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > GTK is what we would recommend on this list. ;-) Both are certainly > reasonable. Qt requires a license fee if your software is > proprietary. GTK uses C and Qt C++. This is no longer true. Qt is distributed under both the QPL and

Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Havoc Pennington
Ed Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know that there are other GIU development tools out there, like Qt. > Is GTK+ the best place for me to be starting? I know, I'm asking to > start a flame war, and this is not my desire. I really don't know, and > want to know. GTK is what we would

Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Paul Davis
>No, pthreads are not userspace threads in Linux. Linux doesn't use >userspace threads because its context switches are fast enough to do it >in kernel. they don't use user-space context switching, its true. however, they are managed by user-space code (hence the silent, hidden "manager thread"

Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Erik Mouw
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:37:18PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > >I plan to install the latest 2.4 kernel, Red Hat 7.1 distro. I'm sure > >it will include GTK+, glibc, etc. Will that be GTK+ 1.2 or 2.0, or > >both? Is there a reason why I would want one over the other? Also, I > >have probably ev

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread Iain
On 27 Apr 2001 13:33:38 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I notice that there are no options controlling scrollbar display in the 2.0 > api. I think it would be useful to allow programmers (and users) to specify > how they want the three elements of the scrollbar. Users - maybe/yes Programmers

access GtkCalendar inside GnomeDateEdit ?

2001-04-27 Thread Anthony Tekatch
How can I access the GtkCalendar inside GnomeDateEdit. I want to limit the calendar to no month changes. -- Anthony Tekatch ___ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Re: Newbie questions

2001-04-27 Thread Loban Amaan Rahman
> Ed> I see that GTK+ has some kind of resource files. Is there any kind > Ed> of graphical screen design tool, similar to the Microsoft Resource > Ed> Editor, where I can drag and drop controls; use a property box to > Ed> define their properties; stretch, mangle and bend them ti

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread Havoc Pennington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thanks, that's good to know. I suppose I shouldn't ask if that will work > under Windows as well, should I? > Of course it will, GTK is just the same on Windows. We never use native widgets, for better or sometimes worse. Havoc ___

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread Bill Haneman
>> Is the GTK+ scrollbar sensitive to the mousewheel (I don't know, I don't >> have one) ? >This already works in GTK 1.2 even. ;-) > >Havoc Cool... guess I should have checked the code ;-) -Bill ___ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://m

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread skip
Owen> I think the NeWs options is not going to fly, but we do have plans Owen> for making the other possibilities theme selectable via style Owen> options. Thanks, that's good to know. I suppose I shouldn't ask if that will work under Windows as well, should I? -- Skip Montanaro (

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread Helmethead
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:41:16PM +0100, Bill Haneman wrote: > Hey, while we're on the topic... > > Is the GTK+ scrollbar sensitive to the mousewheel (I don't know, I don't > have one) ? I do, and it is I bought my flashy mouseman+ in my quake days ;) _

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread Havoc Pennington
Bill Haneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey, while we're on the topic... > > Is the GTK+ scrollbar sensitive to the mousewheel (I don't know, I don't > have one) ? > > It would be cool if the slider could be scrolled "forward/up" and > "backward/down" by the mousewheel if the scrollbar had

Gnome Accessibility

2001-04-27 Thread Padraig O'Briain
Hi, A new mailing list gnome-accessibility-list has been created for engineering discussions of Gnome Accessibility. A new GNOME project, atk, which contains the initial code for ATK (Accessibility Toolkit) was created yesterday. Soon GTK+ will depend on this project. We will shortly be crea

GTK

2001-04-27 Thread Ilir Hysko
Hi, there I'm trying to learn how to program in GTK+ but I'm having some trouble.Could you please help me? My questions: What is a visual in GDK? What are:font ascent,font descent,and text ascent,text descent? Is there any function to select text? I'd really appreciate if you answer my question

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread Bill Haneman
Hey, while we're on the topic... Is the GTK+ scrollbar sensitive to the mousewheel (I don't know, I don't have one) ? It would be cool if the slider could be scrolled "forward/up" and "backward/down" by the mousewheel if the scrollbar had focus. (Whether "up==right" or not might be locale-dep

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread Owen Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I notice that there are no options controlling scrollbar display in the 2.0 > api. I think it would be useful to allow programmers (and users) to specify > how they want the three elements of the scrollbar. Here's some bad ascii > art to demonstrate the three obvi

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread skip
Nils> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> ... three obvious possibilities ... >> >> <[||]--> >> >> [||]--<> >> >> <>[||]-- Nils> I've also seen these: ...

Re: scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I notice that there are no options controlling scrollbar display in the 2.0 > api. I think it would be useful to allow programmers (and users) to specify > how they want the three elements of the scrollbar. Here's some bad ascii > art to demonstrat

scrollbar display options

2001-04-27 Thread skip
I notice that there are no options controlling scrollbar display in the 2.0 api. I think it would be useful to allow programmers (and users) to specify how they want the three elements of the scrollbar. Here's some bad ascii art to demonstrate the three obvious possibilities for GtkHScrollbar:

Re: focus and sensitivity bug

2001-04-27 Thread Bill Haneman
> >Hi! > >There was some discussion last November about the bug in 1.2 where >insensitive widgets could still get focus. > >Does anyone know if this is fixed in 2.0? > >Thanks! >Davina Whoa, is this always a bug? For accessibility it's nice to be able to focus-traverse the widget set to query i

Re: disabling auto background clear

2001-04-27 Thread John Cupitt
Havoc Pennington wrote: > > John Cupitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I looked at gdk, and I think gdk_window_set_background() does > > XSetWindowBackground( color->pixel ), so I'm not sure this will work :-( > > > > You can give NULL to gdk_window_set_back_pixmap(), but that doesn't seem > > t

Re: GTK rc binding question

2001-04-27 Thread Neil Bird
Owen Taylor wrote: > So, binding sets established in a RC file do nothing for GtkEntry > (in GTK+-1.2; in GTK+-2.0, GtkEntry does everything through > binding sets.) Cool; I'll wait for 2.0 to finish being sorted and stop trying to accomplish the impossible :-) Besides, browsing through the