gtktextdisplay failed to work on a StrongARM SA1110 embedded system.

Hi, I'm currently porting DirectFB and GTK+-2.0.9 to a StrongARM SA1110 embedded system. The kernel is 2.4.18-rmk7. Almost everything work fine now, except the text widget. Each time I try text widget within testtext or gtk-demo, it segfaults with following error message: Gtk-ERROR **: file

Re: Re: GTK+ 2.2 for Win32?

Everywhere I see I find references to GTK+ 2.0, not 2.2. Is 2.2 not ready for Windows? Besides, is the latest Windows GTK+ (whichever it is) production quality already? I need to know this to decide wether we use GTK+ for a project which must run in Windows and GTK+. Thanks. Apparently it is

a bunch of issues

Hi! I've been toying with GTK for some time now. Previouly I have been coding software for MS, but now I want to go multiplatform. I have a couple of questions. Mainly regarding GtkEntry (but not only) * How do I change the text color in GtkEntry to for example red? * Is it possible to

Re: Re: GTK+ 2.2 for Win32?

Everywhere I see I find references to GTK+ 2.0, not 2.2. Is 2.2 not ready for Windows? Besides, is the latest Windows GTK+ (whichever it is) production quality already? I need to know this to decide wether we use GTK+ for a project which must run in Windows and GTK+. Thanks.

Re: a bunch of issues

* How do I change the text color in GtkEntry to for example red? http://pobox.com/~hp/gtk-colors.html * Is it possible to force the focus to stay on the widget (GtkEntry) = after the user pressed TAB? handle the key_press and key_release events, return TRUE if the key is one that you don't

underline with pango

Hello, i have a problem: what can i do for have an underline font in a GtkEntry? It's possibile with pango_attr_underline_new() ? or there is an other way ? thansk, dr hammer __ Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture

Re: a bunch of issues

* Is it possible to force the focus to stay on the widget (GtkEntry) = after the user pressed TAB? handle the key_press and key_release events, return TRUE if the key is one that you don't want handled by the normal mechanism. Well, this should work fine. But there may be more than

Re: a bunch of issues

At 12:01 PM 1/24/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 6 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Ziemski?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: a bunch of issues Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:18:14 +0100 This is a multi-part message in MIME format.